PM Singh stabbed peace while meeting Zardari? Will Gilani meeting see same?

The last time Prime Minister Singh met President Zardari, he started the meeting with a very strange sentence. The undiplomatic language displayed hubris, vacuity of ideas, uncivilized behaviour, and a total lack of understanding of the situation in South Asia.

Manmoahan Singh’s Shivaji attack during an embrace

The white dowager’s brown servant delivered the Brahmin message in the manner it had been scripted. The way Mr. Manmohan Singh greeted Mr. Asif Zardari not only shocked the demure Mr. Zardari, the rudeness has reverberated beyond the Urals, down the Himalayas to the Sea of Karachi. The entire planet knows that Mr. Singh is a seat warmer for the younger Gandhi the real power and the Premier in waiting. Everyone knows that “monkey say monkedo” is the culture of the Rashpati Bhavan where bags of money decide “elections”. The world heard the puppet Prime Minister regurgitate what the Sonia and the Nehru clan had told him to say. Like a juvenile toddler in his terrible two’s Mr. Singh was seen as a spoilt toddler jumping up and down complaining after he has lost his favorite teddy. The temper tantrum impressed no one. Perhaps Mr. Singh has gone senile and forgot where he was.  The septugarian Premier was behaving as if he was showing up at a schoolyard brawl after being told by the headmistress to repeat a certain line. It was seen for what it was worth, “Complaint diplomacy” at its worst.

‘I am happy to meet you but my mandate is to announce that the territory of Pakistan must not be used for terrorism,’

MUMBAI (Reuters) – A meeting of the prime ministers of India and Pakistan on the fringes of the Non-Aligned Movement Summit this week could set the stage for a dialogue between the rivals that was stalled after last November’s attack in Mumbai.

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Yusuf Raza Gilani will meet in Sharm-el-Sheikh in Egypt after their foreign secretaries have talked.

While their talks will be focused on Pakistani action with regard to the attacks in Mumbai that killed 175 people, the leaders may leave the door open to resumption of dialogue, especially with Singh back in power for a five-year term. Reuters. Pakistan, India meet may lead to dialogue Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:20pm EDT. Pakistan to put Mumbai attack suspects on trial, 11 Jul 2009By Rina Chandran. (Editing by Jeremy Laurence)

There are fault lines between the Hindu Muslim ecumenical harmony. No where are the fault lines sharper than in the discussion of the protagonists in Battle of Pratapgarh fought on November 30, 1659. The battle was fought between the Mughal forces and the renegades who were against the state. To say the very least the controversial Shivaji is not considered a person of any high reputation by contemporary historians. Secular Indian consider is just a battle between two armies, however the Hinduvata consider is a battle between Muslims and Hindus.

The Mughal forces were of course a huge conglomeration of Sikh, Marhatta, Rajput, Hindu, Muslim, and other forces. In fact one of Aurenzeb’s disowned sons who did not succeed in overthrowing the king was part of the Shivaji army.

Credible historians agree on these facts which are not in dispute.

  • Facing a huge Mughal Army Shivaji sent a letter saying he was not eager to face Afzal Khan in battle, and he wanted a negotiated settlement.
  • Facing imminent defeat by the overwhelming Mughal force Shivaji decided to meet Afzal Khan under the guise of diplomatic negotiations.
  • Afzal Khan, after leaving Bijapur wanted agreed to meet Shivaji in an open ground without arms and under normal diplomatic norms of peace and honesty.
  • Face to face diplomacy was considered a matter of integrity for the Mughals.
  • A meeting was arranged between Afzal Khan and Shivaji at the foothills of Fort Pratapgad.
  • A wanted criminal, Shivaji was was not greeted with a rainfall of arrows and was not attacked by 25 Mughal soldiers. He was accorded safet.
  • Afzal Khan had a large physical stature leading a battle hardened veteran army. He considered this assignment as a small matter of stamping out a pesky regional chieftain who was physically weak and in to position to fight the mighty Mughal Army.
  • Shivajiprepared carefully and diligently for this encounter; he secretly armed himself with sharp metal razor weapon called wagh nakh (tiger claw), and chilkhat (armour) prior to the meeting.
  • Afzal Khan embraced him before the commencement of supposed negotiations
  • During the embrace Shivaji surreptously attacked AfzalKhan with the “wagh nakh” and “bich’hwa”, spilling his blood and entrails on the ground.

Mr. Singh’s statement was akin to the Shivaji embrace and will be remembered as such for a very long time.

“Now that the Congress party-led coalition has come back, Singh is unlikely to feel the need for maintaining the hardline position that he adopted (before the election) on the composite dialogue,” said B. Raman at the South Asia Analysis Group.

“The question is no longer whether it will be resumed, but when and how it will be projected,” he said.

Pakistan has been pushing for the resumption of the five-year-long peace talks broken off by India after the Mumbai attacks, which India blames on Pakistan-based militants.

Peace between the two nuclear-armed rivals had helped boost bilateral trade to over $1 billion, encouraged cross-border bus and train services, and eased visa restrictions for travel.

Fresh from his meetings in Italy with leaders of the G8, Singh, who has said he was willing to meet Pakistan “more than half way” if it cracked down on militants, will be keen to bring home some progress on Pakistan, as well.

“We will do all that is necessary to resolve all outstanding issues that have bedeviled India’s relations with Pakistan,” Singh said en route from Italy after the G8 summit.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s planned visit to India later this month could prompt Singh to make a gesture.

The United States is keenly interested in resumption of talks between the two countries to ease tensions on Pakistan’s eastern border with India, so it can focus on fighting Taliban militants on its western border with Afghanistan.

“Singh would find it difficult to reject suggestions from the U.S. for a political gesture to Islamabad by way of a resumption of the composite dialogue,” Raman said.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chODE9wfCWo&feature=player_embedded

EXTRA MILE

The meeting in Sharm-el-Sheikh will be the third high-level bilateral talks since the November attacks: Singh met Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari at a regional summit in Russia last month, and the foreign ministers met recently in Italy.

India has demanded Pakistan bring to book members of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) group that it blames for the Mumbai attack, and that it dismantle the infrastructure that supports groups like the LeT and the Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD).

Pakistan is keen to show it is making an effort: on Saturday, the interior minister said they had “gone the extra mile” to complete their investigations into five suspects accused of involvement in the Mumbai attacks.

The suspects, including Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, an LeT commander accused of masterminding the Mumbai attacks, are expected to go on trial this week.

“In the best case scenario, Pakistan has perhaps finally recognized that a policy of fighting some terrorists, while harboring others, is only hurting its own interests,” said Lisa Curtis, a research fellow at Washington’s Heritage Foundation.

But it would be foolhardy to rush into dialogue, she warned.

“Pushing for a resumption of peace talks without concerted action against the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks could well embolden groups like LeT to up the ante,” she said. Reuters. Pakistan, India meet may lead to dialogue Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:20pm EDT. Pakistan to put Mumbai attack suspects on trial, 11 Jul 2009By Rina Chandran. (Editing by Jeremy Laurence).

The Cadet College bred Mr. Zardari who has spent a decade in prison knew quite well how to respond to the rudeness and cheap shots. He bit his lip and didn’t vocalize what he really wanted to say “Same applies to you m*******” scu*** b***, or “this coming from a sorry exscuse of a puppetwho has stopped our water‘, “don’t try to obfuscate your support for the terrorirsts, just call the dogs off in Swat“,  ”if you came out of your Ashram you would see that Paksitan soldiers are fighting your terrorists in Swat” or “we know how you are supplying the BLA“, or “we still remember your Mukti Bahni”, or “you should stick to what you do best ’seat warming‘…or a host of other thoughts which went through his mind, which even we can’t pen down.

Mr. Zardari didin’t do the obvious “eenth ka jawab pathar seh“. He took the Sindhi route. He knew Mr. Singh was playing for the peanut gallery. Mr. Zardari smiled knowingly, and then showed his personal hospitality and stature by waving his hand and showing Mr. Manmohan Singh the way towards the sitting room.

As he was walking to his seat Mr. Zardari must have had empathy for the old man in front of him. Gurmukh Singh and Amrit Kaur would be really disappointed in you Mr. Singh. Seems like you your Oxbridge education has been wasted. Your birthplace in the heartland of hospitality of Gah (Chakwal District), of Pakistani Punjab surely disowns you for good reason. You have no manners. Mr. Zardari’s  snicker was worth a thousand pages. He too was warming the seat for a younger prince, but at least, he was doing it for his own flesh and blood, not for a half breed from Italy.

Mr. Zardari for all his faults and weaknesses, has a strength, he stays cool  a cucumber. By ignoring the claptrap, Mr. Zardari exposed the shallowness of Mr. Singh’s personality. Mr. Zardari’ mature sagacity overwhelmed the cheap crack that Mr. Singh was told to deliver. On further analyzing the rehearsed, cryptic and terse statement of Mr. Singh, one can see the frustration felt by Bharat who was told by Mr. Obama to withdraw troops from the Pakistani border and shut down the Bharati consulates in Afghanistan or at least pare them down. The world is not buying Delhi’s script on Mumbai, and the entire world has told Delhi that it doesn’t need dozens of Consulates in Afghanistan. Mr. Singh’s “complaint diplomacy” hasn’t worked with China and hasn’t worked with the USA. What makes him think that it will work with Pakistan. His  wailing is alike a boy, calling wolf all the time, is now seen in diplomaticd circles as a personal weakness– his hollow public posturing has been a disgusting failure.

Of course the drama and feigned tight lipped smiles were for the cameras, but no one was fooled. it was obvious that the US State Department had brought Mr. Singh to the negotiating table, not kicking and screaming, but certianly with an arm twisted behind his back.

Mr. Zardari did not want to be seen as the spoiler. The world wanted Bharat and Pakistan to be all “lovy dovey”. If this gets the Bharati army out of Kashmir, one can bear the unpleasantness of shaking hands of  slimy characters. His attitude was “whatever“. If I have to take a shower afterwards, so be it, but I won’t show my disgust at shaking the hands of Mr. Singh–at least not in public.

Once in the privacy of his own quarters, away from the earshot, Mr. Zardari made it very clear to the Premier that this public posturing needs to be matched with concrete steps on the ground. He reinforced what Mr. Obama had written to Mr. Singh. “Stop the nefarious activities being carried out by the Bharati Consulates in Afghanistan”.

The Pakistani reporters all over the world are in total shock at the attitude of the Bharati (aka Indian) Premier. In the interests of diplomacy, the Pakistani team didn’t pay Mr. Singh in kind. Pakistan seeks peace with India as an equal partner, not as a reward for good behaviour

“Foreign Minister denied that Singh’s tough words set the meeting off on a negative front, according to Reuters, saying ‘I would look at it differently, I think it is a positive development the fact that the two leaders are meeting for the first time, on the sidelines of the SCO summit, since the tragic Mumbai incident. I think it is a positive development.’Dawn/Agencies/AFP

The rudeness meant for public consumption was indeed a reaction to the strong pressure placed on Delhi for the resumption of the fruitless talks. This is Lucknow and obviously Mr. Singh doesn’t have pre-requisites to be treated like a gentleman.  No one understand why the Pakistani attitude was defensive and apologetic. Appeasement doesn’t get peace. Kowtowing doesn’t end war. Mr. Mahmud Qureshi has to take some pills to grow a backbone or the Pakistanis will find someone who has grit and steel.

The foreign minister went on to tell APP that the two sides had agreed to talks between the foreign secretaries of the two countries, saying ‘In the meeting, Pakistan would apprise India about the steps it took against terrorism and would also discuss to address the Indian concerns in this regard.

Peace is always in the mutual interest of parties tied up in conflict. One party does not do the other party any favors. It is the height of arrogance to convey the impression that peace talks are a reward for good behavior of one party. By portraying Pakistan as the guilty party, Delhi sabotages any prospect for peace. If the Americans and the Russians can smoke the peace pipe, so can the Indians and the Pakistanis–however it has to be done on the basis of dignity and mutual respect, not diktat and dictation.

It is obvious the US pressure has forced Delhi to withdraw its occupation forces from Kashmir. Delhi is chagrined that it had to comply to American “requests”, and it is now dramatizing this defeat by issuing strange undiplomatic statements.

Former senior diplomats close to the foreign policy establishment here say that back-channel negotiations on Kashmir — the contested border territory that is the central dispute between the two nations — are set to begin again, something the United States has quietly urged.

Such behind-the-scenes talks came close to reaching a blueprint of an agreement on the decades’ old dispute while Gen. Pervez Musharraf was Pakistan’s president... New York Times

Even the New York Times, known for its Anti-Pakistan stance acknowledged, though begrudgingly admitted the failure of the Bharati “Complaint diplomacy”. Of course one could never expect an unbiased article from Sengupta but it does have kernels worth mentioning.

“Quarrels with Pakistan limits perceptions of India outside,” said Salman Haidar, a retired Indian diplomat and a former foreign secretary, the highest civil service post in the diplomatic service. “It makes India look stuck. It’s not floating.”Lydia Polgren, Somini Sengupta, Published: June 16, 2009. Hint of a Thaw for India and Pakistan

Mr. Singh has failed in all his efforts to isolate Pakistan. Instead of isolation, the US actually tripled its aid to Pakistan. The entire Bharati establishment was in high gear trying to portray Pakistan as a fountain of terror. The world rallied around Pakistan with arms and money to overcome the TTP. Sonia and gang wanted an embargo on Islamabad, China, Iran, the US and now even Russia is sending arms and equipment to the Pakistan army. The abject failure of diplomacy got Pranab Mukherjee fired. Now, Mr. Singh will be going soon too. This cartoon caricature defines Mr. Singh very concisely.

Still others are wary that it will make India look as though it is bending to American pressure…

William Burns last week nudged New Delhi by resurrecting Kashmir in his public remarks, saying that the wishes of the Kashmiri people should be taken into account in any settlement. This has long been United States policy, but any hint of interference by outside parties in what India sees as an internal affair tends to raise hackles here.

Shamshad Ahmad, a former top Pakistani diplomat said that the meeting “breaks some ice,” adding that “this is only happening because of Washington’s pressure.”

Despite India’s growing ties with the United States, there is no agreement in India about the Obama Administration’s engagement with Pakistan. Some fear that while the United States is keen to defeat the Taliban on Pakistan’s western border, it may not be ready to do enough to staunch Lashkar-e-Taiba and similar Pakistan-based groups that specialize in anti-Indian attacks. Lydia Polgren, Somini Sengupta, Published: June 16, 2009. Hint of a Thaw for India and Pakistan

If Bharat wants peace with Pakistan, it has to dismantle the infrastructure of the RSS and the BJP and gag the Islamphobes that it nurtures within its borders. If Bharat wants peace it has to stop sabotaging Pakistan at all international forums, and begin supporting common and Pakistani causes. Jointly fighting for the Basmati patent, and IRRI copyright would help the atmosphere of friendship.

Pakistan wants all issues back on the table, including UN resolutions passed in 1948 giving Kashmiris the right to a plebiscite, which had been set aside by former President Pervez Musharraf in an effort to secure a peace deal with India. “Musharraf went beyond his mandate. How can he set aside the UN?” said Hasan. “He went rather overboard in offering that to India. The Indians should have grabbed it, but they didn’t.” Daily Times

The Bharti and Pakistan leaders were meeting on the sidelines of the G-8 summit. New Delhi which had tried to put on hold the so called five-year-old peace process. The so called peace process has ben long on talk and short on resutls, with Bharat using one excuse or the other not to resolve Kashmir, or withdraw its forces from Kargil, Sicahin, and Sir Creek. One of the excuses used was that  Pakistan must act against against the Lashkar-i-Taiba militants which Bharat holds responsible for the Mumbai attacks. Pakistan has been asking for proff of these allegations which has not been provided.

The US has been instrumental in nudging Mr. Singh and his puppeteers in Delhi. Hillary Clinton will be visiting the area soon to consecrate the “composite dialogue” and a settlement of Sir Creek, Siahin, Water and Kashmir.

US pressure has already begun paying dividends and a significant change in the Indian mood vis-à-vis ties with Pakistan is noticeable. Recent statements by Indian leadership including those by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, President Pratibha Patil and Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna are indicative of a shift in the Indian position.

Diplomats say there is a growing realization in Delhi as to how long it could sustain the policy of not talking to Islamabad particularly in the backdrop of the fact that the desired objectives of the talks’ suspension have not achieved their objectives and were rather hurting India’s own regional interests.

Besides, diplomats believe that India is cognizant of growing US pressure for the resumption of the peace process, and wants strained relations to start returning to normalcy soon, because it would not like the normalization to be perceived as a Washington driven initiative. Dawn

There is much in common between India and Pakistan, but there is much that separates the countries. Mere cultural affinity and anathema to religion cannot wish the differences away. Bharat must recognize that Pakistanis do not see Delhi as the perfect model to emulate on anything. Therefore Delhi must stop wishing for a Pakistan in its own image. There are many routes to success, and Pakistanis admire the Chinese a lot more than they admire Indians. The Pakistani world is asking. Why meet in Egypt if the Bharatis have forgotten their manners.

The statements emanating out of Delhi seem to suggest that Bharat (aka India) will begin talks about peace with Pakistan if this, that, or the other happens. This is the typical Bharati arrogance that keeps both countries embroiled in perpetual enmity. India, come what may, cannot dictate its terms to Islamabad. If Bharat wants peace in the Subcontinent, it has to change its attitude towards all her neighbors–Nepal, Lanka, Bhutan, Sikkim, China, Bangladesh and Pakistan. While the other states may accept some bullying from Delhi, China and Pakistan will not. In the light of the Nuclear factor, Delhi cannot out stare Islamabad.

Speaking yesterday, Zardari reiterated the need for better communication and cooperation within the region, saying ‘I think what is missing in this war … is that the neighbours haven’t been involved, the region has not been involved’.Agencies/AFP/Dawn

Delhi has to tone down its rhetoric on terror. Islamabad and the world knows who is behind the TTP in Swat. If Delhi wants peace with Pakistan, it has to pull back in Afghanistan and Swat. It has to make major territorial concessions in Kashmir and the border areas. Once the border disputes have been resolved, the sky is the limit in cooperation with Pakistan. Sir Creek and Siachin have to solved and resolved quickly. Once Kashmir is resolved in accordance with the UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people, the Pakistan government will find to problem in helping Bharat gain trans-national travel through Pakistan. However this  has to be on a mutual basis which would allow Pakistani truck to reach Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh. Bharat must live up to the letter and the spirit of the Indus Water treaty and begin treating Pakistanis are friends rather than enemies. A positive development was the supportive statments by the Russian president.

Russian President Dmitri Medvedev reiterated this at a meeting with Zardari, saying that ‘we are ready for cooperation with Pakistan in all aspects of the fight against terrorism,’ urging better economic ties with the country viewed in Moscow as a US ally. ‘We think it is important that the situation in the region becomes calmer and healthier,’ he added. ‘I this will help … to preserve Pakistan as a single and strong state.’

It is not Delhi’s god given right to rule Kabul. Nor does Bharat extend from Kabul to the Raj Kalhani in the East. Bharati religions preach the eternal history of Bharat beyond its borders. If Bharat is a secular country then this transnational dreams of a greater Bharat must be brought back to reality. Every time Adhvani and Modi open their mouths, peace is sent back a decade.. Mr. Singh had earlier kept up his mantra on terror.

‘The spectre of terrorism, extremist ideologies and illicit drug trafficking haunts our region. Terrorist crimes committed today are transnational in nature,’ Singh said in the text of the speech, which was given to reporters. He added that ‘it is imperative that we genuinely cooperate with one another and on a global scale to resolutely defeat international terrorism.’

There are many types of peace. It is obvious that India has neither the capacity nor the wherewithal to impose peace of the sort that exists between the Native Americans and the US government. India is not Israel and Pakistan is not the Gaza strip. If Israel with all its might could not force an unequal peace on unequal partners (Syria, Palestinians and Lebanon) it is also very obvious that Delhi cannot impose peace on Pakistan the same way. Bharat could not break up Lanka and make it Kowtow to Bharat. It cannot force Pakistan. It has to woo Pakistanis if she wants peace on her Western borders.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Bookmark and Share Add to TechnoratiRSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | July 12th, 2008 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

Dissecting the etymology of the word “India”

Historical Linguistics gives us great insights into the world we live in. Glottochronology informs us about dialects and how words evolved. Morphophonemics is the study of the phonological realization of the allomorphs of the morphemes of a language. Let us look into the art of semantics, and scrutinize the science of lexicostatistics. Let us try to trace the etymology of the word “India” what it means and where it came from.

Of course the word has different meaning for different people. The meaning of the word has changed over the past several centuries and continues to evolve.

OFFICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL NAME:  BHARAT

One of the most fascinating quotes that could be a doctoral dissertation in philology or a multi-volume monograph in psycholinguistics comes from a stalwart of the British Empire who know the world really well. His words ring true today, as much as were accurate more than hlaf a century ago.

“India” is as much a country as the Equator: Sir Winston Churchill.

The real name of the country is actually Bharat. This distinguishes it from what many call the British Raj.

‘India is no more a country than the Equator’.Winston Churchill

Our thesis goes as follows. The land of the Ganges is separate and distinct from the land of the Indus.  Pakistanis live on the banks of the Indus. Bhartis don’t, they live on the banks of the Ganges.

Logic and linguistic geography dictate that Ganges residents should be called “Ganghans”.

Morphophonemics informs us that the origins of the word Anglacized as “India” Come from “Hind”. Descriptive linguistics defines the onomastics of the word as follows.

  • Sindhu…Hindhu…
  • Sindh….Hindh…
  • Sindh…Sindhi..
  • Hindhi …Indus…India..

Tabari and other historians inform us that Hind and Sindh were the two regions identified by Arab travelers. The Arab monkier “Sindhi” refers to Sindh–categorized those living on the banks of the Indus. The Arab name “Hindi” those who live on the Ganges.

as per the Times Atlas, there is definately no mention of civilization starting from what is now called India,or the Hind, as termed by the Arab Geographers in the 8th Century AD. Even they classified two entities Sind-wa-Hind, that is Sindh AND Hind. To further broaden the mental horizons of the learned doctor, he is referred to read the History of India 1849 Edition (It was the British who had coined term British India thus uniting Sindh-wa-Hind into one entity). The history of India above quoted is by Sir Henry Elliot. It consists of eight volumes.

As per this book Volume I, ” Balhara, is the King whom the petty states now called India paid tribute. Each prince of the state was master of his home state.” And in the historical records paid tribute to the Sassani Shahs of Iran. When the Arabs took over the Iranian Empire, technically they had become vassals of the new masters. To understand this historical fact the Doctor is now reffered to read the 43 volumes of history of Al-Tabari (Died 928AD). Published by the New York State Press University 1987. To further enlighten him, I would strongly stress that he should read also Tabakat-i-Nasiri of Maulana Usman written 1250-1260AD, translated by H.G.Raverty 1881 Edition.

In the introduction of the book, Maulana Usman describes the evolution of mankind from Prophet Adam downwards. Quoting authorities like, Tawarikh-I-Ajam, the mother source of Shahnama-I-Firdousi & also various works of the, “Zoroastrians” & other authentic informations.”When Kabil slew his brother Habil, Adam had another son born to him, who was names” Shis” which signified in the old language”Given by God” & he became the ruler over adam’s descendents, the parsi, say this Shis was the Gaiu-mart (The first of the Bastaniah/Peshdadi Dynasty) but the muslims insist that it was “Unnush” son of Shish who is the Gaiu-mart” . Thus starts the history of this august ruling house & the various settlements of the clans/tribes in the various parts of the then known world. Dr. Yasmeen-Attorney and journalist, Pakistan

The real name of the country was ”Hindustan“…too hard for British to pronounce. In fact many Hindu mahasaba leaders insisted that the country be called Hindustan.

Dr. Ambedkar discusses Swaraj and quotes Mr. Savarkar. Firstly, the retention of the name Hindustan as the proper name for “lndia”. “The name “Hindustan” must continue to be the appellation of our country. Such other names as India, Hind, etc., being derived from the same original word Sindhu may be used but only to signify the same sense—the land of the Hindus, a country which is the abode of the Hindu Nation. Aryavarta, Bharat-Bhumi and such other names are of course the ancient and the most cherished epithets of our Mother Land and will continue to appeal to the cultured elite. In this insistence that the Mother Land of the Hindus must be called but “Hindustan,” no encroachment or humiliation is implied in connection with any of our non-Hindu countrymen.

Our Parsee and Christian countrymen are already too akin to us culturally and .arc too patriotic and the Anglo-indians too sensible to refuse to fall in line with us Hindus on so legitimate a ground. So far as our Moslem countrymen are concerned it is useless to conceal the fact that some of them are already inclined to look upon this molehill also as an insuperable mountain in their way to Hindu-Moslem unity. But they should remember that the Moslems do not dwell only in India nor are the Indian Moslems the only heroic remnants of the Faithful in Islam. China has crores of Moslems. Greece, Palestine and even Hungary and Poland have thousands of Moslems amongst their nationals. But being there a minority, only a community, their existence in these countries has never been advanced as a ground to change the ancient names of these countries which indicate the abodes of those races whose overwhelming majority owns the land. The country of the Poles continues to be Poland and of the Grecians as Greece. The Moslems there did not or dared not to distort them but are quite content to distinguish themselves as Polish Moslems or Grecian Moslems or Chinese Moslems when occasion arises, so also our Moslem countrymen may distinguish themselves nationally or territorially whenever they want, as “Hindustance Moslems” without compromising in the least their separateness as Religious or Cultural entity. Nay, the Moslems have been calling themselves as “Hindustanis” ever since their advent in India, of their own accord. “But if in spite of it all some irascible Moslem sections amongst our countrymen object even to this name of our Country, that is no reason why we should play cowards to our own conscience. We Hindus must not betray or break up the continuity of our Nation from the Sindhus in Rigvedic days to the Hindus of our own generation which is implied in “Hindustan,” the accepted appellation of our Mother Land. Just as the land of the Germans is Germany, of the English England, of the Turks Turkistan, of the Afghans Afghanistan—even so we must have it indelibly impressed on the map of the earth for all times to come a “Hindustan”—the land of the “Hindus.” Mr. Savarkar

There is a fascinating tale to be told about that fateful date on August 14th, 1947 when the people who lived on the Indus told the British that they wanted to continue to live together, just like they had lived together for the past 5000 years in the Indus Vallay and 7000 years as part of the Mehergarh civilization.

Many think that British “India” was a monolith. In fact it was more than 570 states. The British controlled only 40% of the area. The rest was part of princely states.

The princely states, which had all entered into treaty arrangements with the British Crown, were allowed a degree of local autonomy in exchange for protection and representation in international affairs by Great Britain.The British Indian Empire included the regions of present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, and, in addition, at various times, Aden (from 1839 to 1937), Lower Burma (from 1852) and Upper Burma (from 1886) until 1937, British Somaliland (briefly from 1884 to 1898), and the Straits Settlements (briefly from 1819 to 1867). The British Indian Empire had some ties with British possessions in the Middle East; the Indian rupee served as the currency in many parts of that region. What is now Iraq was, immediately after World War I, administered by the India Office of the British government.The first 100 years were the East India Company years.

Lord Mintos SubcontinentHow many states can you count?” the differences in India, between the two major nations, the Hindus and the Muslims are a thousand times greater when compared with the continent of Europe.

(answer is not “1″, it is more than 570)

This article lists the more than 570 states that comprise the Subcontinent. Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh are only the major players. A discussion of the more than 570 states explains the Subcontinent as it existed in 1940, as it existed in 1947 and as it existed in 1948. The purpose of describing each state is to define the historical linguistics and define the linguistic geography of the region.

Quaid-e-Azam, Mohammed Ali Jinnah said that:

Muslim vs. Hindus” the differences in India, between the two major nations, the Hindus and the Muslims are a thousand times greater when compared with the continent of Europe. ” the differences in India, between the two major nations, the Hindus and the Muslims are a thousand times greater when compared with the continent of Europe.

 ” the differences in India, between the two major nations, the Hindus and the Muslims are a thousand times greater when compared with the continent of Europe.” the differences in India, between the two major nations, the Hindus and the Muslims are a thousand times greater when compared with the continent of Europe.India is not a national state, India is not a country, but a sub-continent composed of nationalities, the two nations being Hindus and Muslims whose culture and civilization, language and literature, art and architecture, name and nomenclature, sense of value and proportion, laws and jurisprudence, social and moral codes, customs and calendar, history and traditions, aptitudes and ambitions, outlook on life and of life are fundamentally different nay in many respects antagonistic. Mohammad Ali Jinnah

The 5000 year old ancient trade routes between Pakistan and China are being revived with modern freeways that were ocnstructed 20 years ago. 5000 years ago the Harrappan Pakistanis were trading with the ChinesePakistan existed 5000 years ago as the “Indus Valley Civilization.” One of the facts of history was that Alexander thought that the Indus was an ocean, and there was nothing beyond it. The Indus was so wide and so full of water that armies could sometimes not see the other bank. The sciences of paleography, philology, phonetics, phonology inform us about the details of the origins of the word “India”. Let us see what the Greeks and the Persians refered to the area.

The very name of India comes from the river. … the Persians changed the name to ‘Hindu’; and the Greeks dropped the ‘h’ altogether. Chinese whispers created the Indus and its cognates – India, Hindu, Indies. From the time that Alexander the Great’s historians wrote about the Indus valley, spinning exotic tales of indomitable Indika, India and its river tantalized the Western imagination.Hundreds of years later… it might have been logical for the new Muslim state in the Indus valley to take the name ‘India’ (or even ‘Industan’, as the valley was called by an eighteenth-century English sailor). But Muhammad Ali Jinnah rejected the colonial appellation and chose the pious neologism Pakistan, ‘Land of the Pure’, instead. He assumed that his coevals in Delhi would do the same, calling their country by the ancient Sanskrit title, ‘Bharat’. When they did not, Jinnah was reported to be furious. He felt that by continuing to use the British name, India had appropriated the past; Pakistan, by contrast, looked as if it had been sliced off and ‘thrown out’. Empires of the Indus by Alice AlbiniaAlice Albinia guardian.co.uk

Pakistan exsited 5000 Years ago as the IVCA historical and tectonic divide existed thousands of years ago. The Indus Valley Civilization was on the banks of the Indus. The Genetic Valley Civilization is on the banks of the Ganges.

The 5000 year old ancient trade routes between Pakistan and China are being revived with modern freeways that were ocnstructed 20 years ago. 5000 years ago the

The people up the river Indus lived with the people down the river Indus lived together in 3500 BC just as they live together now.

“Pakistan” existed 5000 years ago. It was not called “Pakistan”. China 5000 years ago was also called something else. Egypt 5000 years ago was called something else.The word “India” comes from “Hind” or “Sind”. It was called that because of the river Sindh. The Arabs used to call all those who lived on the river and byond Sindu or Hindu. The constitutional name of the country is “Bharat”.

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape| RUPEE NEWS | Moin Ansari | Aug 29, 08 | معین آنصآرّی | اخبآٌْْر رپیہ |

The great Persian naval fleets of Cyrus were defeated by the Greeks because the Iranians did not have the foresight to see the future. More than 300 ships burned in 492 BC. The Persian Empire was unable to keep the small city states of Athens and Sparta. Today ancient Persia and modern Iran faces enemies within its borders and the barbarians are at the gates of Iran on all sides.The Persian Empire included Pakistan at times.

Timurs’ EmpireThe empire of Taimur in the 15th century included Pakistan but not todays “Bharat“. The Malay peninsula has been defiend in many way and included many states and included parts of the Subcontinent and even Iran’s Sistan-Baluchistan. British Indian Empire included many countries of Asia, Afghanistan, Burma, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, Aden ane even Iraq.

French Indian EmpireThe French “Indian” EmpireThe French Indian Empire included the Southern part of the Subcontinent, plus Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos.

Many states included. Posessions of the Dutch empire in the SubcontinentThe Dutch Indian Empire included southern part of the Subcontinent and even Indonesia. The Danish Indian Empire included parts of Southern Subcontinent.

Obviously the tug of war continues. India’s attempts to destabilize Pakistan will continue.  The solution is to absorb all the Pashtun areas into Pakistan and then combine Afghansitan as Afghania  into PakistanThe religious divide in the Subcontinent. The religious divide was real. This map shows the Muslim and non-Muslim population in the Subcontinent. The British Empire was a diverse land.The religious divide in the Subcontinent. The religious divide was real. This map shows the Muslim and non-Muslim population in the Subcontinent. The British Empire was a diverse land.

The British Empire does not even show half of PakistanNotice hundreds of states in the Subcontinent. Less than half fell under British Raj, the rest were independent states.

Presidencies 1893The British Indian Empire showing parts of Burma, but Baluchistan, and Pashtun areas are not included.

Indian Empiure includes Ceylon, Burma, AfghanistanThe Britsh Indian Empire map showing Afghanistan and parts of Iran and Thailand as part of the empire.

Railway maps included BurmaMany maps different parts of of Asia showing various part of the “Indian” empire.

Many states existed. Some parts of the Subcontinent were under direct British control also.

Decoding Sir Creek challenges between Pakistan and IndiaThe boundaries kept on changing. Sometimes it included Aden, Somalia, Iraq, Burma, Nepal, Sri Lanka. At other times it included other parts of Asia. Sometimes it included Afghanistan, at other times it did not. Sri Lanka was part of the British Indian Empire at times.

Throughout history, the struggle for the independence of the Subcontinent has been struggle against centralism and the struggle has been waged to create for provincial autonomy. The Government of India Act of 1919 set out in clear terms the subjects which were to belong to the provincial sphere and those to the Central sphere. But both the Congress and the Muslim League boycotted the elections to the provincial and Central Legislatures held in November 1920 under the Act, because they felt that the Central vernment had still retained too much of power over the provinces.Bharat” is the official and constitutional name of the country. “India” was never a country. It was a conglomeration of languages, tribes, states, provinces, East India Company (Company Bahadur) owned poppy fields and British owned lands. The more than 500 states and many countries including Iraq, Somalia, Aden, Burma and others formed the British “Indian” Empire. After 1947 when the British were leaving the states on the West banded together to form Pakistan and the ones in the Gangetic Civilization banded together to form “Bharat” (Constitutional name of “India.”)

Throughout history, the struggle for the independence of the Subcontinent has been struggle against centralism and the struggle has been waged to create for provincial autonomy. The Government of India Act of 1919 set out in clear terms the subjects which were to belong to the provincial sphere and those to the Central sphere. But both the Congress and the Muslim League boycotted the elections to the provincial and Central Legislatures held in November 1920 under the Act, because they felt that the Central vernment had still retained too much of power over the provinces.The British Indian Empire, informally, the British Raj (rāj, lit. “rule” in Hindi) or simply British India, internationally and contemporaneously, India, was the term used synonymously for the region, the rule, and the period, from 1858 to 1947, of the British Empire on the Indian subcontinent. The region included areas of British India directly administered by the United Kingdom (contemporaneously, “British India”) as well as the princely states ruled by individual rulers under the paramountcy of the British Crown.

The princely states, which had all entered into treaty arrangements with the British Crown, were allowed a degree of local autonomy in exchange for protection and representation in international affairs by Great Britain.The British Indian Empire included the regions of present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, and, in addition, at various times, Aden (from 1839 to 1937), Lower Burma (from 1852) and Upper Burma (from 1886) until 1937, British Somaliland (briefly from 1884 to 1898), and the Straits Settlements (briefly from 1819 to 1867). The British Indian Empire had some ties with British possessions in the Middle East; the Indian rupee served as the currency in many parts of that region. What is now Iraq was, immediately after World War I, administered by the India Office of the British government.The first 100 years were the East India Company years.The princely states, which had all entered into treaty arrangements with the British Crown, were allowed a degree of local autonomy in exchange for protection and representation in international affairs by Great Britain.The British Indian Empire included the regions of present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, and, in addition, at various times, Aden (from 1839 to 1937), Lower Burma (from 1852) and Upper Burma (from 1886) until 1937, British Somaliland (briefly from 1884 to 1898), and the Straits Settlements (briefly from 1819 to 1867). The British Indian Empire had some ties with British possessions in the Middle East; the Indian rupee served as the currency in many parts of that region. What is now Iraq was, immediately after World War I, administered by the India Office of the British government.The first 100 years were the East India Company years.

the-526-states-in-the-subcontinent.gifThe British Indian Empire began in May 1858 when the British exiled Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar II to Rangoon in then independent Konbaung Burma after executing most of his family, thus formally liquidating the Mughal Empire. At the same time, the British abolished the British East India Company and replaced it with direct rule under the British Crown.

” the differences in India, between the two major nations, the Hindus and the Muslims are a thousand times greater when compared with the continent of Europe.In proclaiming the new direct-rule policy to “the Princes, Chiefs, and Peoples of India”.. The Viceroy of India announced in 1858 that the government would honour former treaties with princely states and renounced the “Doctrine of Lapse”, whereby the East India Company had annexed territories of rulers who died without male heirs.

This map of 1853 “India” does not show half of Pakistan.About 40 percent of Indian territory and 20-25 percent of the population remained under the control of 562 princes. In August 1858 the British Parliament abolished the English East India Company and transferred the company’s responsibilities to the British crown. This launched a period of direct rule in India, ending the fiction of company rule as an agent of the Mughal emperor (who was tried for treason and exiled to Burma). In November 1858, in her proclamation to the “Princes, Chiefs, and Peoples of India,” Queen Victoria pledged to preserve the rule of Indian princes in return for loyalty to the crown. More than 560 such enclaves, taking in one-fourth of India’s area and one-fifth of its people, were preserved until Indian independence in 1947.

PakistanThe Pakistan that was proposed in 1940

Continent of Dinia and dependencies Large Ch. Rehmat Ali map

A discussion of the sovereign and independent Princely States at the time of independence on August 15, 1947 is very pertinent to understand why “India” is a very ephemeral word.

… India unambiguously regards itself as the dominant power in the region. It has waged war with China, three wars with Pakistan, occupied the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir, annexed the Portuguese enclave of Goa, seized the princely Muslim state of Junagadh, annexed the Himalayan state of Sikkim, exerts political control over Nepal and Bhutan, intervened militarily in Pakistan’s civil war which established Bangladesh, intervenes in the Tamil-Sinhalese violence in Sri Lanka, continues to conflict with Pakistan over the boundary of the Siachen glacier and is adamant in its refusal to implement a series of United Nations resolutions starting in 1948 calling for a plebiscite in Kashmir. In view of these well-defined instances of hegemonic impulse there can be little wonder about Pakistan’s concern that its security technology should match India’s.

In his autobiography, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, analyzed the strategy of the United States to bring India and Pakistan together as a buffer against China. He deftly characterized the Pakistani view of India, “The idea of becoming subservient to India is abhorrent and that of cooperation with India, with the object of promoting tension with China, equally repugnant.”Ralph Braibanti

Occupied Srinagar is influenced by the Kashmiri traitors Abdullah and sons who sold out to India and even changed the name of their party “Plebiscite Front”.There have been various differences in organisation before, repeatedly quite significant, during the British Raj.

Sri Lanka is now an independent state.

Pakistan is independent.

Bharat as it exists today:Given a modicum of political will, Danger-I and II may still be manageable, however, Danger III to its territorial integrity in the Northeast may prove to be the most difficult. In fact the entire Northeast can easily be unhooked on multiple counts from the Union. First, these are low populated areas having contiguity with the most densely populated and demographically aggressive country in the world, i.e., Bangladesh. The country has also emerged as a major source of Islamic fundamentalism which impacts grievously on the Northeast. To add to these woes, New Delhi because of sheer vote-bank politics legitimized illegal migration for 22 years through the vehicle of IMDT. Many border districts now have a majority population constituting illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. In near future, this leverage will be used to create an internal upheaval against the Centre as in the case of the Valley. It’s a classic Islamic fundamentalist principle of asymmetric warfare. What cannot be achieved by conventional wars, can be done through infiltration and subsequently internal subversion

Bharat is ridden with the same strife as it has always been. Today the Government of Bharat control about 40% of the area. The Naxalites control hundreds of disctricts as shown in this map.

  • The 250 million Untouchable Dalits are in revolt
  • The 50 million White widows (who are Hindu widows) are incarcerated in Hindu temples and then sold as prostitutes to earn a living. Source: Indian movied Water.

Afghanistan: Part of the the Indian Empire, it is now an independent country.

Afghanistan today is split by the part controlled by NATO and the other part controlled by the Pashtuns. There are strong tendencies in the Pakhtuns to join Pakistan.

Individual residencies

Nepal and Bhutan are now independent kingdoms.

The Subcontinent on the eve of independence in 1947

The following is a boring list but tells a fascinating story about 1947 and tis aftermath. The British did not just leave two dominions in South Asia, she left 570 states which continued to change allegiences to get the best deal. States like Junagarh and Manvadar joined Pakistan, Bhopal wanted to join Pakistan and Hyderabad dfeinately did not want to join Bharat. Hyderabad wanted to stay independent and during the last days of the Nizam had showed some inclination of joining Pakistan.
Princely State Now part of Last (or present) Ruler
Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra & Karnataka, India  H.E.H.Nawab Mir Barakat ‘Ali Khan Bahadur.

The areas marked are under the control of the Naxalites

Given a modicum of political will, Danger-I and II may still be manageable, however, Danger III to its territorial integrity in the Northeast may prove to be the most difficult. In fact the entire Northeast can easily be unhooked on multiple counts from the Union. First, these are low populated areas having contiguity with the most densely populated and demographically aggressive country in the world, i.e., Bangladesh. The country has also emerged as a major source of Islamic fundamentalism which impacts grievously on the Northeast. To add to these woes, New Delhi because of sheer vote-bank politics legitimized illegal migration for 22 years through the vehicle of IMDT. Many border districts now have a majority population constituting illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. In near future, this leverage will be used to create an internal upheaval against the Centre as in the case of the Valley. It’s a classic Islamic fundamentalist principle of asymmetric warfare. What cannot be achieved by conventional wars, can be done through infiltration and subsequently internal subversion

Occupied KashmirJammu and Kashmir

Jammu and Kashmir, India H.H. Dr Karan Singhji

Occupied KashmirThe Muslims of the state of Jammu and Kashmir want to join Pakistan. Kashmir and Ladakh are Muslims majority areas.

January 26th is a dark day for Kashmiris. It is remembered as “Youm-e-Siyah” in Kashmir. Article 370 of the Indian constitution absorbed kashmir on the basis of the forged Article of Accession which was never presented to Pakistan or the United NationsAs per UN resolutions, the Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir want to vote in a referendum to join Pakistan.

  • Azad Kashmir (Poonch District etc.). PakistanMysore Karnataka, India H.H. Maharaja Sri Kantadatta Narasimharaja Wodeyar Bahadur,
  • Nepal: Nepal H.M. King Gyanendra of Nepal
  • Sikkim: Sikkim, India H.H. Muwong Chogyal Sri Sri Sri Sri Sri Tobgyal Wangchuk Tenzing Namgyal Tehri Garhwal Uttarakhand, India H.H. Maharaja Manujendra Shah Sahib Bahadur
  • Bhutan: H.M. Jigme Khesar Namgyal Wangchuck Kumaon Uttarakhand, India

Baluchistan Agency

  • Princely States of the Baluchistan Agency. Ruler Kalat Balochistan, Pakistan Ahmad Yar Khan
  • Kharan Balochistan, Pakistan Habibullah Khan
  • Las Bela Balochistan, Pakistan Ghulam Qadir Khan
  • Makran Balochistan, Pakistan Bai Khan Baloch Gikchi

Deccan: States Agency and Kolhapur Residency

  • Princely States of Deccan States Agency and Kolhapur Residency.
  • Princely State Now part of Last (or Present) Ruler Akalkot Maharashtra, India Shrimant Rani Sumitra Bai Raje Bhonsle, Rani Saheb of Akalkot
  • Aundh Maharashtra, India HH Meherban Shrimant Bhagwant Rao Shripat Rao, Pant Pratinidhi Of Aundh
  • Bhor Maharashtra, India Raja Shrimant Sir Raghunathrao Shankarrao Babasaheb Pandit Pant Sachiv
  • Janjira Maharashtra, India HH Nawab Sidi Muhammed Khan II Sidi Ahmad Khan, Nawab of Janjira
  • Jath Maharashtra, India Lt. Shrimant Raja Vijaysinghrao Ramrao Babasaheb Dafle
  • Kolhapur Maharashtra, India HH Shrimant Rajashri Shahu II Chhatrapati Maharaj Sahib
  • Bahadur, Maharaja of Kolhapur
  • Kurundwad Maharashtra, India Meherban Raja Hariharrao Raghunathrao [Bapusaheb] Patwardhan, co-Raja of Kurundwad Jnr
  • Mudhol Karnataka, India HH Shrimant Raja Bhairavsinhrao Malojirao Ghorpade II
  • Phaltan Maharashtra, India Major HH Raja Bahadur Shrimant Malojirao Mudhojirao Nanasaheb Naik Nimbalkar IV
  • Sangli Maharashtra, India Capt. HH Shrimant Raja Saheb Sir Chintamanrao II Dhundirajrao Appasaheb Patwardhan
  • Sawantvadi Maharashtra, India Bhonsale clan
  • Savanur Karnataka, India Nawab of Savanur, Abdul Majid Khan II
  • Gwalior Residency Princely States of the Gwalior Residency.

These lists contain the name of the Princely State, Now part of, and the  Last (or Present) Ruler

  • Gwalior Madhya Pradesh, India H.H. Maharajadhiraj Maharaja Shrimant Jyotiraditya Rao Scindia, Maharaja Scindia of Gwalior Varanasi Uttar Pradesh, India Bhadaura Madhya Pradesh, India Garha Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Khaniyadhana Madhya Pradesh, India Paron Madhya Pradesh, India Raghugarh Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Rampur Uttar Pradesh, India H.H. Nawab Syed Muhammad Kazim ‘Ali Khan
  • Bahadur, Nawab of Rampur
  • Umri Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Madras Presidency Princely States of the Madras Presidency.

These list contain the Princely State, the geogphphical location called “ Now part of” and the Last (or Present) known Ruler

  • Cochin Kerala, India Kerala Varma
    Banganapalle Andhra Pradesh, India H.H. Nawab Sayyid Fazl-i-’Ali Khan IV Bahadur, Nawab of Banganapalle
    Pudukkottai Tamil Nadu, India H.H. Raja Sri Brahadamba Das Raja Sri Rajagopala Tondiman Bahadur, Raja of Pudukkottai Sandur Karnataka, India Shrimant Maharaj Shri Murarrao Yeshwantrao Ghorpade, Hindurao, Mamlukatmadar Senapati, Raja of Sandur Travancore Kerala, India Colonel H.H. Maharaja Raja Ramaraja Sri Patmanabha Dasa Vanchipala Martanda Varma III [Uthradom Tirunal], Maharaja of Travancore

North-West Frontier Princely States of the North-West Frontier.

These list contain the Princely State, the geogphphical location called “ Now part of” and the Last (or Present) known Ruler

  • Amb North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan (Nawab) Salahuddin Saeed Khan
    Chitral North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan HH Mehtar MUHAMMED MUZAFFAR al-MULK
  • Dir North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan Muhammad Shah Khosru Khan
    Phulra North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan Ata Muhammed Khan
    Swat North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan Miangul Abdul-Haqq Jahanzib

States of the Punjab.

These list contain the Princely State, the geogphphical location called “ Now part of” and the Last (or Present) known Ruler

  • Bahawalpur Punjab, Pakistan Sadeq Mohammad Khan V
  • Bilaspur Punjab, India H.H. Raja Kirti Chand, Raja of Bilaspur
  • Faridkot Punjab, India Lt. H.H. Farzand-i-Sadaat Nishan Hazrat-i-Kaisar-i-
  • Hind Raja Bharat Indar Singh Brar Bans Bahadur, Raja of Faridkot
  • Jind Haryana, India H.H. Maharaja Satbir Singh ["Prince Sunny"], Maharaja of Jind
  • Kalsia Punjab, India Raja HIMMAT SHER SINGH Sahib Bahadur
  • Kapurthala Punjab, India Brig. H.H. Maharaja Sri Sukhjit Singh Sahib
  • Bahadur, Maharaja of Kapurthala
  • Khairpur Sindh, Pakistan George Ali Murad Khan
  • Loharu Haryana, India [[H.H. Nawab Mirza Alauddin Ahmad Khan II [alias Parvez Mirza], Nawab of Loharu]]
  • Malerkotla Punjab, India
  • Mandi Himachal Pradesh, India H.H. Raja Sri Ashokpal Sen, Raja of Mandi
  • Nabha Punjab, India H.H. Maharaja Hanuwant Singh Malvinder Bahadur, Maharaja of Nabha
  • Patiala Punjab, India Capt. H.H. Maharajadhiraj Shri Amarinder Singh, Maharaja of Patiala
  • Siba Himachal Pradesh, India H.H. Raja Dr.Ashok K.Thakur
    Sirmur Himachal Pradesh, India Lt. H.H. Maharaja RAJENDRA PRAKASH Bahadur
  • Suket / Surendernagar Himachal Pradesh, India H.H. Raja Hari Sen, Raja of Suket”

The states of East Punjab in India want to be indpendent

States of the Rajputana Agency

These list contain the Princely State, the geogphphical location called “ Now part of” and the Last (or Present) known Ruler

  • Alwar Rajasthan, India HH Maharaja Tej Singh
  • Banswara Rajasthan, India .H. Rai Rayan Mahimahendra Maharajadhiraj Maharawalji Sahib Shri Jagmalji II Sahib Bahadur, Naresh Rajya, Maharawal of Banswara.
  • Bikaner Rajasthan, India H.H. Sri Raj Rajeshwar Maharajadhiraj Narendra Sawai Maharaja Shiromani Ravi Raj Singhji Bahadur, Maharaja of Bikaner and Head of the Royal House of Bikaner.
  • Bundi Rajasthan, India Col. HH Maharao Raja Shri BAHADUR SINGHJI Bahadur
  • Dholpur Rajasthan, India H.H. Rais ud-Daula, Sipahdar ul-Mulk, Saramad Rajha-i-Hind, Maharajadhiraja Shri Sawai Maharaj Rana Shri Hemant Singh, Lokendra Bahadur, Diler Jang Jai Deo, Maharaj Rana of Dholpur.
    Dungarpur Rajasthan, India H.H. Rai-i-Rayan, Mahimahendra, Maharajadhiraj Maharawal Shri Mahipal Singhji II Sahib Bahadur, Maharawal of Dungarpur.
  • Jaipur Rajasthan, India Maharaja Sawai Man Singh II
  • Jaisalmer Rajasthan, India HH Maharajadhiraj Maharawal Sir JAWAHIR SINGH Bahadur
  • Jhalawar Rajasthan, India .H. Maharajadhiraj Maharaj Rana Shri Chandrajit Singh Dev Bahadur, Maharaj Rana of Jhalawar.
  • Jodhpur Rajasthan, India H.H. Raj Rajeshwar Saramad-i-Rajha-i-Hindustan Maharajadhiraja Maharaja Shri Gaj Singhji II Sahib Bahadur, Maharaja of Jodhpur.
  • Image:Karauli.svg Karauli Rajasthan, India HH Maharaja Shri GANESH PAL Deo Bahadur Yadakul Chandra Bhal
  • Kishangarh Rajasthan, India HH Umdae Rajhae Buland Makan Maharajadhiraja Maharaja SUMER SINGHJI Bahadur
  • Kotah Rajasthan, India HH Maharao Shri BHIM SINGH II Bahadur
  • Kushalgarh Rajasthan, India Rao HARENDRA SINGH
    Palanpur Gujarat, India Maharajkumar Edward Man Sing
  • Pratabgarh Rajasthan, India Raja AJIT PRATAP SINGH
  • Shahpura Rajasthan, India HH Rajadhiraj SUDERSHAN SINGH
  • Sirohi Rajasthan, India HH Maharani Gulab Kanwar Bai
  • Tonk Rajasthan, India Nawab Muhammad Faruq Ali Khan
  • Mewar Rajasthan, India Maharana Sir Bhupal Singh
  • Lawa Rajasthan, India

Gujarat States Agency and Baroda Residency

  • Districts of Gujarat
  • Laxmi Vilas Palace, BarodaBalasinor
  • Bansda
  • Bajana
  • Devgadh Baria
  • Baroda
  • Bhavnagar
  • Cambay
  • Chhota Udaipur
  • Dangs
  • Dhrangadhra
  • Gondal
  • Idar
  • Jawhar
  • Kutch
  • Lunavada
  • Morvi
  • Navanagar
  • Porbandar
  • Radhanpur
  • Rajpipla
  • Sachin
  • Sanjeda Mehvassi
  • Sant
  • Sanjeli
  • Surgana
  • Tharad
  • Vijaynagar
  • Wankaner
  • Vanod

HydrabadManavadar acceeded to PakistanManavadar acceeded to PakistanJunagarh remains Pakistani territoryJunagarh ManvanagarAfter  Gurdaspur, a Muslim majority area was illegally given to India Kashmir’s link is to India. Why waste people’s time to ask such silly questions? The Naxalites want independence. Why doesn’t India give it to the millions.Junagarh and Manvadar acceeded to Pakistan but were captured by India

States of Central India Agency

  • Subhash Marg, Indore
    Bhil tribe girls in JhabuaAjaigarh
  • Ali Rajpur
  • Alipura
  • Baoni
  • Barannda
  • Barwani
  • Beri
  • Bhopal
  • Bijawar
  • Charkhari
  • Chhatarpur
  • Datia
  • Dewas
  • Dhar
  • Garrauli
  • Gaurihar
  • Indore
  • Jabua
  • Jaora
  • Jaso
  • Jigni
  • Kamta-Rajaula
  • Khaniadhana
  • Khilchipur
  • Kothi Baghelan
  • Kurwai
  • Lugasi
  • Maihar
  • Makrai
  • Mathwar
  • Muhammadgarh
  • Nagod (Unchhera)
  • Narsingarh
  • Orchha
  • Panna
  • Pathari
  • Piploda
  • Rajgarh
  • Ratlam
  • Rewah
  • Samthar
  • Sarila
  • Sitamau

States of the Eastern States Agency

Aranchul Pradesh is claimed by China

  • Ujjayanta Palace in Tripura
  • Palace in Cooch Behar Athmallik
  • Bastar
  • Baudh
  • Changbhakar
  • Chhuikhadan
  • Cooch Behar
  • Darbhanga
  • Daspalla
  • Dhenkanal
  • Jashpur
  • Kalahandi
  • Kanker
  • Kawardha
  • Khairagarh
  • Kharsawan
  • Khondmals
  • Koriya (Koriya)
  • Mayurbhanj
  • Nandgaon
  • Nayagarh
  • Pal Lahara
  • Patna
  • Raigarh
  • Ramgarh
  • Sakti
  • Saraikela
  • Sarangarh
  • Sonpur
  • Surguja
  • Talcher
  • Tripura
  • Udaipur

The above article was taken from Wikipedia.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Kashmiri history

 

 

Kashmir is part of Pakistan Kashmir map: Kashmir is part of Pakistan

Kashmir and the subcontinent has a rich and tumultuous history. We can pick up the pieces in the nineteenth century, but the actual history of Kashmir begins much much much earlier, before Islam or Hinduism was present on the soil of our lands.

Long before the Crescent and Star flew atop Islamabad, long before Mohammed Bin Qasim invaded Sind, long before the Mughals spread prosperity in all the nooks and corners of the subcontinent, long before the Sikh dynasty got Kashmir from the British, long before the Chundra Gupta Vikramadatya ruled India, the people of Kashmir were tied to the people of Pakistan.

Kashmir has been in existence since 5000 years. Its history can be traced to time immemorial. Kashmir has always been a magnet to immigrants.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate this page on to one of these languages: Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Bookmark and Share Add to Technorati Subscribe to our RSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | November 30th, 2007 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ | Save/SharePost to MySpace!

This is what Edward Desmond has to say about Kashmir in his book Himalyan Ulster:

On a map of the western Himalayas, the valley of Kashmir shows up as a smooth, oval-shaped patch amid a sea of surrounding peaks in what is today Indias Jammu and Kashmir state.

For thousands of years, travellers, freebooters, and empire builders have set down their breathless impressions of this valley the French writer Francois Bernier called it the paradise of the Indies with its towering pine forests, deep lakes, flower carpeted meadows, and fields of iridescent saffron. The seventeenth century Mughal emperor Jehangir sighed on his death-bed that his last wish was to visit Kashmir. Indians today revere the valley as the place they long to visit, and it serves as the setting for countless romantic Indian films.

Prior to Hinduism in the subcontinent, the Kashmir Valley (called Abhasrsa) traded with the Indus Valley Civilisation. In pre-Vedic times the people who lived in the Indus Valley lived in absolute harmony. There is some confusion as to who were the original inhabitants of the subcontinent. Many feel that there was a civilisation BEFORE the Dravidians landed in South Asia. Some have ventured to claim that based on the fact that all of Indias neighbours are Oriental, perhaps the original inhabitants of ancient India were Oriental in ethnic origin. The Dravidians either defeated the original peoples of India or totally assimilated with them. The Dravidians came to the subcontinent and made it their home. This is known: The Dravidians were not Hindu, the Dravidians preceded the Hindu era in the Subcontinent. The peaceful Dravidians were an enlightened and cultured peoples and they formed the Indus Valley Civilisation.

The Aryans came to the subcontinent in many waves, and caused havoc with the local inhabitants. These barbaric hordes came to the subcontinent and totally destroyed the earlier civilisations and formed their own caste systems. After many waves of Aryans had invaded the subcontinent, Hinduism as a later wave to the land now called Pakistan. Hundreds of years were spent in wars between the Dravidians and the Aryans. These wars are noted in pre-vedic literature as Ramayana. After the Aryan Hindus had settled in the land, they started fighting amongst themselves. The Inter-Aryan wars were called the Mahabharta wars. Hindus claim that 650 million soldiers died in the Mahabaharta wars (I didn’t make up the numbers, I just reported them !).

The Arayans arrived in South Asia in waves. The Huns, the Rajputs and others were always in conflict. After the Hindu conflicts died down, around the 8th century B.C Buddhism took root in the subcontinent. Buddhist-Hindu wars claimed many lives.

The Kashmir valley was mostly inhabited by many people that included sun worshippers, Zorastarians, and Buddhists. Kashmir became an important centre of Brahman learning. Brahaman art, literature and philosophy flourished unhindered, on the backs of the untouchables, and the lower caste Hindus. After the 8th century the clear and loud message of Islam was heard in the Valley. It was the Sufis who carried the message of Mohamamd to Kashmir. The caste system of the Hindus, the Brahman cruelty, and the practices of Sati, and human sacrifices were fertile grounds for Islam in Kashmir. Slowly but surely, people converted to the message that accorded the Untouchables INSTANT equality among the Muslim brotherhood.

From 1326 to 1819, Muslims improved the lot of the Kashmiris and ruled the Kashmir valley with compassion and honour. The Mughals not only ruled Kashmir, they also brought it art, culture, music, paintings, and architecture that the people had never seen. Wherever the Moghuls lived they brought life with them. The Shalimar Gardens and the Mosques built in the Valley are a testament to the affluence of India in the 16th century. Jahangir was the wealthiest man on the planet and he spent his money to create luxury for his people. Kashmir benefited too. Hindu temples built in the sixteenth century were subsidised, and today they remain in the valley.

Hindus thrived in the Valley. The forefathers of the Nehrus lived and prospered in Kashmir during the Muslim rule. During the regimes of chaos during the Afghan rule (1752-1819) many Muslims lost their lives due to Patel persecution.

Kashmir was sold to the Sikhs following the defeat of Sikhs at the hands of the British in 1846, Gulab Singh, the cruel and dim-witted Dogra ruler of Jammu, acquired Kashmir from the British and ruthlessly tired to rule the state of Jammu & Kashmir.

The period of the Dogra rulers was the darkest in the history of the state. Gulab Singh was a ruthless ruler. He ruled by edict only, the edict of the Kirpan. Thus Jammu & Kashmir became a Princely State and remained so till 1947 until India occupied it.

ABHISARA

Contrary to popular belief, Kashmir is not a monolith. It has been called many names throughout history. The recorded history of Kashmir is more than five thousand years. On the eve of Alexander’s invasion, Kashmir was called Abhisara. The great Kashmiri historians, Kalhan and Ratnakar have written beautiful stories about the valley, but the story of Kashmir begins much before that and Rajatarangini of Kalhana records some of it. Ibn-e-Batuta, Al-Beruni and Fa-hien mention Kashmir in their travelogues. Many Mughals, including Akbar mentions Kashmir in their many diaries. Muslim Kashmiri poets have eulogised the beauty of the Valley of Kashmir for centuries. Lalitaditya Avantivarman, Sikander Butshikan, Shamas-u-din Iraqi, Mirza Hyder Dughlat, Faquirullah Kanta, Mir Hazar Khan Zainul-Abedin, Duralabhavardhana, Jiyapida are only a few of the famous kings of the Valley.

Some Indian revisionists have tried to portray the picture that Kashmiri history begins with Maharaja Ghulab Singh. Kashmiri history began a long time before partition, a very long time before Ghulab Singh. It surely began before the very brief Sikha-Shahi of Lahore. To start the history of Kashmir in the nineteenth century is like beginning the history of the subcontinent after the war of independence of 1857 (The Great Indian Mutiny).

Kashmir and the subcontinent has a rich and tumultuous history. We can pick up the pieces in the nineteenth century, but the actual history of Kashmir begins much much much earlier, before Islam or Hinduism was present on the soil of our lands.

Long before the Crescent and Star flew atop Islamabad, long before Mohammed Bin Qasim invaded Sind, long before the Mughals spread prosperity in all the nooks and corners of the subcontinent, long before the Sikh dynasty briefly controlled Kashmir, and long before the Chundra Gupta Vikramadatya ruled India, the people of Kashmir were tied to the people of Pakistan.

The history of the subcontinent pre-dates Hinduism. Some in secular India are pawning off religion as history. Vedic events are religion. Ramayana and Mahabharta are the holy scriptures of Hinduism. These scriptures need to be revered and respected. We learn a lot about our land from these scriptures.

The state of Kashmir was not created by the Sikhs. Various areas of Kashmir were re-incarnated by the Sikhs during the British rule. The British defeated the Sikh leader, and the rule reverted to Hindu (Dogra) maharaja.

Ancient Origins
Some recent historians have portrayed the history of the subcontinent as wars between two monoliths, the Hindus and the Muslims. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The history of the subcontinent is a history of wars between the various peoples who lived the subcontinent and the people who came to the subcontinent. The history of the subcontinent is replete with wars against the foreigners.

Some recent revisionists have portrayed the history of Hinduism as the history of India. The absolute fact is that The Indus Valley Civilisation preceded the Aryans, and preceded Hinduism. IF Islam is a foreign influence in the subcontinent so is Hinduism. The Aryan Swastika was imported from the caucus mountains, and has non-Indian origins. The only original people of the subcontinent were the people who were in the Indus Valley Civilisation.

Stone Age
Though man existed in Palaeolithic, and Stone ages, the first real civilisation in the subcontinent was the Indus Valley Civilisation. The Pakistanis of Sindh, Punjab, Kashmir the Baraouhis tribes of Balauchistan are the true descendants of the Indus Valley Civilisation . The Aryans were invaders who came and destroyed the Indus Valley Civilisation. The Aryans then began creating states in the rest of India. The story of Ramayana is basically a story of wars between the Aryans and the Dravidians. The story of Mahabharta is a story of inter-Aryan wars.

Around 468 B.C. Jainism and Buddhism appeared on the scene. Both competed with the tenants of Hindusim. Gautam Buddha was such a dynamic sage, that many Hindus have adopted him as a God. Even some Muslims consider him a prophet. However the fact remains that Buddhism is different from Hinduism.

Though many Hindus later regard Buddha as God, the Brahmans were always leery of Buddhists because this reduced their power. Buddhism is fundamentally different than Hinduism because it does not believe in the caste system. Because of the lack of the caste system, the Brahmans did not like Buddhists.

Alexander Invades
On the eve of Alexander’s invasion, Kashmir was called Abhisara. Abhisara consisted of the districts of Punch and Naushara. One of the few direct results of the Greek invasions of India was the establishment of Greek colonies in the area of Kashmir. One of Asokas edicts refers to the existence of Yavana (Greek) settlers on the fringes of his empire. We now know that he was referring to the area of Hunza. Actually after the fall of the Muyeria (Greek) kingdoms in India, the Bacterians formed a number of Greek kingdoms in the area in and around Kashmir. In fact Chandragupta actually faced Alexander for military help (324-300 BC) but did not secure it.

The foundation of the Maurya empire in the subcontinent saw Kashmir exist on the outer fringes of the empire. Chandragupta Muyara was a Jain. According to the records of Hieun Tsang and Kalhanas Rajaatarangini, Kashmir was included in the empire of Asoka the great (273-232 BC). One of the most brutal massacres of Hindus occurred at the hands of the Muyara kings. Some historians put the number at 300,000 (akin to 3 million in present day numbers).

Contrary to BJP belief, all massacres in India were not committed by Muslims, Persians and Arabs. Asoka renounced violence, and renounced his religion after the Kalinga war, and he became a Buddhist. The Brahmans did not like him, and many historians think the Brahaman opposition to Asoka led to the destruction of the Muyarian dynasty.

With political disunity in the subcontinent, many foreigners invaded India. Alexander’s kingdom was divided. The Bacterians invaded India (250 BC). From the ashes of the Muyara empire, Kanishka the conqueror rose to power (78 AD) and began a new era in India. He annexed the Indus Valley and conquered Kashmir. He set up his headquarters in Purushapura (Peshawar). Kanishka was a Zorastrian. His coins display the sun god. Later in life he supported Buddhism (to the ire of the Hindu Brahmans). Kanishka had convened the Buddhist Council of Kashmir to spread Buddhism instead of Hinduism in the subcontinent (much to the chagrin of the Brahmans ). During Asoka, Buddhism had become the state religion. Hinduism survived only due to Indian princes like Gautamiputra Satkarni.

With the fall of the Muyara dynasty, the Guptas came to power (beginning of the fourth century AD) with their independent kingdoms. Dr. R.C. Majumdar writes that The empire of Samudragupta included the whole of Northern India EXCEPT Kashmir. During this time Fa-hien visited India to study Buddhism (399 AD). The Gupta period saw the distinct revival of Hinduism in the subcontinent. Buddhism declined, and never did rise in India. Kashmir was either independent at the time or was an insignificant state.

When did Kashmiri History begin
Although some Indians would like it to make it so, the history of Kashmir does not begin with Maharaja Ghulab Singh. Kashmiri history began a long time before partition, a very long time before Ghulab Singh. It surely began before the very brief Sikha-Shahi of Lahore. To start the history of Kashmir in the nineteenth century is like beginning the history of the subcontinent after the war of independence of 1857 (The Great Indian Mutiny).

The recorded history of Kashmir is more than five thousand years. The Sikh Dogras have said wonderful things about the paradise called Kashmir, but the story of Kashmir pre-dates Sikhism. The great Kashmiri historians, Kalhan and Ratnakar have written beautiful stories about the valley, but the beautiful story of Kashmir pre-dates Hindusim. Muslim Kashmiri poets have eulogised the beauty of the Valley of Kashmir for centuries, but the story of the valley pre-dates Islam. Lalitaditya Avantivarman, Sikander Butshikan, Shamas-u-din Iraqi, Mirza Hyder Dughlat, Faquirullah Kanta, and Mir Hazar Khan are only few of the famous kings of the Valley.

The history of the subcontinent pre-dates Hinduism. Some in secular India are pawning off religion as history. Vedic events are religion. Ramayana and Mahabharta are the holy scriptures of Hinduism. These scriptures need to be revered and respected. If these holy scriptures are mistaken for history, than we are all in trouble.

The IVC

Five thousand years ago the people of the Indus Valley Civilisation lived in harmony on the banks of the Indus. Moenjadaro, Harappa and Taxila were all towns on the banks of the Indus. This was one of the original civilisation on the planet. This civilisation is marked as great a civilisation as the Chinese and the Egyptian civilisation. The Indus Valley Civilisation did not extend East of the Indus. Neither did it extend beyond the Western Mountain ranges of Bolan, and Khyber. The Indus Valley Civilisation existed on the banks of the Indus. The Indus valley Civilisation existed in what is today Pakistan. Pakistan is the natural inheritor of the Indus Valley Civilisation, just like modern day China is the natural inheritor of the Chinese civilisation, and modern day Egypt in the natural inheritor of the Egyptian civilisation. Pakistan existed 5000 years ago, even though it was not called Pakistan. This is the geographic two nation theory.

People up the river traded with people down the river. People up in the mountains traded with people down in the plains. For thousands of years, Kashmiris cut down trees and threw them into the river. This was trade at its best. The people of the Indus valley traded with Mesopotamia to the West, but there was no civilisation to the east of the Indus to trade with. There were only monkeys and apes. A human civilisation did exist in the Malaya straits but that was too far for the Indus Valley Pakistanis.

Recent archaeological finds in Kashmir have supported the theory that the Indus valley Civilisation indeed stretched right to the origins of the Indus beyond the Himalayas, into the Karakorums and into Kashmir.

All through the centuries Pakistan and Kashmir were trading partners to the WEST and NORTH-WEST of current Pakistan by land routes and traders with Oman and Gulf state through Arabian sea. In modern times Sindh was part of Bombay presidency and there was hardly any trade across Rajistan desert. Under Mughals, Mirs of Sindh maintained quite an independent administration on current day Sindh Province. The Middle East had always used these Baluchistan, Sarhad, and Kashmir and other areas in current Pakistan to access the main land in India. In fact Gwader is a Pakistani Island port that was owned by Kuwait till the sixties.

Sarhad historically was trading partners with Kashmir, Punjab, Afghanistan and central Asia (including Sinkiang province of present day china). Kashmir did not even have a road link to India except through Muslim dominated portion of Punjab —through a town called Gurdaspur. (The tragedy of Gurdaspuspur is the tragedy of Kashmir. Today The Muslim town of Gurdaspur is part of India, and so is Kashmir). All its trade of fruits, wood and handicrafts was to its south west and west (Punjab and Sarhad) the wood from its forests flowed down the INDUS to Pakistan and all the administrative services such as electricity/postal/communication etc. were linked from present Pakistan. Punjab was the only province which had major trade eastward. But the trade was also with countries to the west as well as rest of Pakistan. All of North west India east of the Khyber pass, is clearly a totally unique country, naturally allied to Kashmir.

THE ARYAN HUNS INVADE THE IVC
With the decline of the Guptas, the nomadic tribes of Central Asia called the Huns invaded India. Their leader Tormana invaded Kashmir (500 AD).

Jawaharlal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says Skandagupta, the fifth of the Gupta line had to face this Hun invasion…gradually they spread all over Gandhara and the greater part of Northern India. THEY TORTURED THE BUDDHISTS AND COMMITTED ALL MANNER OF FRIGHTFULNESS….There must have been continuous warfare against them, but the Guptas could not drive them away. Fresh waves of Huns came …

HINDU SAVAGERY

Jawaharlal Nehru says the following about the Hindu Huns …Torman installed himself king . He was bad enough, but after him came his son Miharagula, who was an unmitigated savage and fiendishly cruel. Kalhana in his history of Kashmir–the Rajatrangini–tells us that one of his Miharagulas amusements was to have elephants thrown over the great precipices into the valley below.

The treatment of men was sometimes worse then that of animals (some of the animals like cows were actually revered because they were Gods). Lower caste Hindus had a miserable life. Other historians have commented that the treatment of women was even worse, specially women of lower castes, they were considered the property of the upper caste Hindus, to be molested and/or raped at will. In many cases the new bride had to stay a night with the village Brahman before she was married off. Kashmir converted to Islam during this time period. It was cruelty like this that led to the whole sale conversion to Islam. The new religion offered them equality and saved them from the Brahmans.

Nehru continues, Soon however the Hun power weakened in India… the Huns have been defeated and driven back, but many remain in odd corners. The Great Gupta dynasty fades away after Balditya.

The next great event for Kashmir was the birth of Harshavardhana (606-647 AD). There are references to Harshas expeditions to Kashmir. According to the Chinese traveller Hiuen Tsang Kashmir was an independent state at the time. Harshas ancestors were sun worshippers, however he himself was attracted towards the Mahayana form of Buddhism. The Brahmans were very displeased with him and even conspired to kill him. Harsha spent time and money on arts and literature, and drama, and was probably the last great Buddhist emperor of India.

THE RAJPUT HINDU ERA IN INDIA

The death of Harsha ushered in an era of anarchy again. The Rajputs were the invaders this time. This era is called the Rajput era. According to Tod The Rajputs were the descendants of Sakas,Huns, Ushans, Gujaaras etc.

According to Rajatarangini of Kalhana which forms the chief source of our history on Kashmir, Duralabhavardhana founded a new royal dynasty in Kashmir about the middle of the 7th century. Lalitaditya ascended the throne in 724 AD and he conquered large areas of India and brought it under Kashmiri rule. After him (750 AD) the power of Kashmir receded.

Jiyapida, the grandson of Lalitaditya tried to revive the reputation of the Karkota dynasty. The Karkota dynasty in Kashmir was replaced by the Utpala dynasty about the middle of the 9th century. The Rajputs were true Hindus and patronised Hindu religion and culture in all of India.

THE RAJPUT ERA ENDS
The end of the Rajput era created the beginning of the Muslim era in India. Dr. Smith says that this became so prominent that the centuries from the death of Harsha to the Mohammedan conquest of Hindustan, extending in round numbers from the middle of the seventh century to the close of the twelfth century, was the Rajput era . This is 500 years of Hindu rule. This is one of the few periods of history when Hindus ruled India.

On the eve of the Arab invasion of Sind (712 A.D: Quaid-e-Azam said that this is the day the Pakistan movement began in India), Chandrapida, the grandson of Durlabhavardhan was the ruler of the Korkot (Kashmir ) kingdom The most powerful king was Muktipida Lalitadya, brother and successor of Chandrapida. He was a great conqueror, and is said to have conquered Punjab, Dardistan and Kabul .

Mahmud of Gahazni made two attempts between 1015-1021 to conquer Kashmir, but was unsuccessful. Mahmud of Ghazni attacked temples in the subcontinent because the temples were the seats of political power. The Brahaman priests kept all knowledge to themselves. They kept all knowledge away from the population, locked up in temples (including the knowledge to build the temple). To destroy the political and military power of the city, the temple had to be destroyed. Since the high priest controlled the populations, they had to be defeated. The temples also contained all knowledge of the area. Mohammed Ghauri was the founder of the Muslim empire in India (1173 A.D). The slave dynasty lasted from 1206-1290. The Khilji dynasty lasted from 1290-1320. The Tughlaq dynasty lasted from (1320-1412). In 1304 Ibin-e-Batuta visited visited China through Kashmir. The Syed and Lodhi dynasty lasted from 1413-1526. During the reign of the sultans of Delhi the Khokars had established themselves between Lahore and Ghazni on the Southern border of Kashmir.

The caste system, the practice of Sati, human sacrifices, the ostracization of the lowest caste Hindus from society, and the treatment meeted out to them led to the infusion of Islam into the beautiful valley of the safron. Since Islam allowed instant equality to the down-trodden the religion made huge in-roads into the valley.

From the eighth century through Muslims permeated the state of Kashmir even though the rulers were Buddhist. Kashmiri rulers were Buddhist till it was conquered by the Muslims in 1339 AD. Even though Kashmir was inhabited by Muslims, it was still being ruled by Buddhist princes till 1349 when Shah Mirza, after the death of his royal patron, ascended the throne under the title of Samsuddin Shah. Thus began the Muslim era in Kashmir. K.Ali writes that of the rulers of Kashmir, Zainul-Abedin was the best and most liberal ruler under whom people enjoyed a peaceful and prosperous reign. After Abedin, anarchy reigned in Kashmir. At the end of 1540, Haider Mirza a relative of the Mughal emperor Humanyun occupied the state. But the Mirza dynasty was overthrown by the Chakk dynasty in 1561.

From the eighth century till the fifteenth century the population of Kashmir changed. However it was not Arab invasions, or Persian conquest that transformed Kashmir, it was the power of the new religion. For seven hundred years Kashmir was under Buddhist rule. However the rule was autocratic, and people were treated like animals. The general populace was disenchanted with the state machinery, and the state religion. IN droves they converted to Islam. By the middle of the sixteenth century, the accession of a Muslim to the throne was a forgone conclusion.

At the time of Baburs invasion 1526 Kashmir and Sind were independent but they did not play any major role. Around the 3rd part of the sixteenth century Kashmir was passing through disorder. The chaotic condition of the state induced Akbar to interfere in its internal affairs. Moreover the excellent climate of the valley and its natural scenery might have attracted Akbar. Akbar conquered and annexed Kashmir in 1586-1587. Henceforth Kashmir became the summer seat of the Mughal government. During Jahangir, and Shahjahan’s reign the Mughals built the magnificent Shalimar Garden in Kashmir. This is long before Ghulab Singh was in Kashmir.

For the next 100 years peace remained in Kashmir. Saddozais (Sikander Butshikan, Shamas-u-din Iraqi, Mirza Hyder Dughlat, Faquirullah Kanta, Mir Hazar Khan ) ruled Kashmir for almost a century before the Sikhs. Peace was broken by the rise of Sikh power. The Sikhs rose to power in 1675 under Guru Gobind Singh. After the death of Gobinda Singh in 1708 the Sikhs established several states in the Punjab. Rajat Singh establish the Sikh empire in the Punjab. The Sikh rule in the history of the subcontinent is a footnote in history. It was extremely brief and was known for its stupidities (hence the word Sikha-shahi, and the jokes about Sikhs). Gulab Singh tried to rule Kashmir by putting together diverse and far-flung areas like Jammu bordering on the Punjab, Ladakh bordering on Tibet and Gilgit bordering on Sinkiang, Afghanistan and Central Asia across the Pamirs. There are many diverse groups in Kashmir. Gulab Sings was a ruthless ruler.

MAHRAJAH HARI SINGH: SEX and FOLLIES OF THE NINCOMPOOP RAJA OF Kashmir

This is what Larry Collins and Dominique Lapiere write about the Sikhs in the Punjab in their book (Freedom at Midnight… the source book for the screen-play Gandhi).The collapse of the Mogul empire gave the Sikhs the chance to carve out a kingdom of their own in their beloved Punjab. The tragedy of the Punjab was that while Moslems, and Sikhs could live under the British, neither could live under each other. The Moslems memory of Sikh rule in the Punjab was one of mosques defiled, women outraged, tombs razed, Moslems without regard to age or sex butchered, bayoneted, strangled, shot down, hacked to pieces, burnt alive. This was the legacy of Gulab Singh and his successors.

This following is what Larry Collins and Dominique Lapiere write about last maharaja of Kashmir Hari Singh in their account of the partition of India (Freedom at Midnight… the source book for the screen-play Gandhi).

Hari Singh was a weak vacillating indecisive man who divided his time between opulent feasts in his winter capital in Jammu and the beautiful flower-choked lagoons of his summer capital, Sirinagar, the Venice of the Orient. He had begun his reign with a few timid aims for reform which were quickly abandoned for an authoritarian system that kept his jails filled with his political foes. Their most recent occupant had been none other than Jawarlal Nehru. The prince had ordered Nehru arrested when he tried to visit the state in which he was born. Hari Singh too had an army to defend the frontiers of his state and give his claims to independence a menacing emphasis.

The bonfire (of the accounts of sexual eccentricities of some of India princes were in themselves lengthy enough to stoke a good fire for hours …. were being burnt at the behest of the British government ) consuming the archives dealing with the maharaja of Kashmir destroyed the traces of one of the more unsavoury scandals of the world between wars. The impetuous prince was trapped in fragrant delicto in Londons Savoy hotel by a man he assumed to be the husband of his ravishing bed companion. In fact, the prince had fallen into a gang of blackmailers who proceeded to drain the state of Kashmir, via the princes personal bank account, OF A VERY CONSIDERABLE PART OF ITS REVENUES. The case finally broke when the young lady’s real husband persuaded that he had not been properly remunerated for the loan of his wife, went to the police. In the court case that followed, the unfortunate Maharajas infidelity was concealed under the pseudonym of Mr. A. Disillusioned for good with women as a result of his tribulations, Hari Singh returned to Kashmir, where he discovered new sexual horizons in the company of young men of his state. The accounts of his activities had been faithfully reported to the representatives of the Crown, Now whipped by the fresh mountain breeze of Srinagar, they disappeared into the Himalayan sky.

He ( Hari Singh) was a weak vacillating man whose perversions and orgies had given him the reputation of the Himalayan Brogia. Unfortunately, Hari Singh, the man who was Mr. A had titillated the readers of the British penny press before the war, was something else. He was the hereditary Hindu maharaja of the most strategically situated princely state in India.

Logic seemed to dictate that Kashmir join with Pakistan. Its people were Moslem. It had been one of the areas originally selected for an Islamic state by Rehmat Ali when he formulated his impossible dream. The k in Pakistan was for Kashmir.

Hari Singh the last playboy Raja of Kashmir was an abdominal character-less hedonist bi-sexual. His only redeeming quality was that he held out against Patels bullying. Hari Singh was escorted out of the state under the curfew of the Indian army. India claims that next day he signed the so called article of accession to India. According to Alistair Lamb a noted historian of Kashmir, has cast several doubts on the article of accession. India’s claim to accession is in dispute. The U.N. recognised the dispute, and treats Kashmir as disputed territory between India and Pakistan.

UNDERSTANDING KASHMIR: A geographic region or an idea?

What is the background of Kashmir ? Pakistan is a country based on the banks on the Indus and its tributaries. All its major cities owe their existence to the rivers originating in the Himalayan mountains. Kashmir lies north of Pakistan, a natural extension to the mouth of the Indus river. It is in the ancient Silk Rout thorough which noted travellers like Ibn-Batuta, and Fa-hein travelled. Pakistan is the size of Texas and Minnesota put together. Kashmir is another Minnesota added to it.

Kashmir means many things to many peoples. The total area of J&K state is 2.22 lakh (222,000) sq. kms. Of this, the Pakistani area accounts for 78,114 sq. kms. Chinese area is 37,555 sq. kms plus another 3,180 sq. kms. ( that was an area adjusted during the boundary agreement with Pakistan ). At present, 35% of the state is Azad Kashmir and 17% is Chinese Kashmir. In a landmark boundary adjustment between Pakistan and China, China received 2.3% from Pakistan (There is no boundary dispute between China and Pakistan. China is today Pakistan’s largest arms supplier. India occupies less than half of the original state which belonged to Hari Singh in 1947). The Indian area is 1.01 lakh (101,000)sq. kms. The Indian area is divided into the following divisions: Ladakh, Jammu and the Kashmir Valley. The Ladakh division is 49,146 sq. kms. The Jammu division is 26,293 sq. kms. and the Muslim Kashmir Valley is 15,948 sq. kms.

The population of the state governed by India is 6 million; of this, 64% are Muslims, 32% are Hindus, 2.2% are Sikhs and 1.2% are Buddhists. Another 2 million Muslims live in Azad Kashmir; taken together, Muslims would constitute 75% of the population of the entire state of Jammu & Kashmir, which is roughly 5% of the total Muslim population of India (the number of Muslims in India is more than 100 million). The Indians claim that in 1947 half a million Hindus and Sikhs also lived in Azad Kashmir. When 5 million Muslims were transferred from East Punjab to Pakistan, half a million Muslims fled Kashmir.

The Indian part of the state of Kashmir is divided into 3 main regions: Jammu, Kashmir Valley and Ladakh. In terms of area, Ladakh forms 58%, Jammu 26% and Kashmir valley 16%. Buddhists used to constitute a majority in Ladakh but a few years ago (according to the last Indian census reports) Muslims are in a majority in Ladakh now. Hindus form a majority in Jammu and Muslims form a majority in Kashmir valley. In British India Kashmir was about 95% Muslim. Before 1947, nearly a million non-Muslims — mainly Kashmiri Hindus called Pundits ruled the Kashmiris with the Dogra ruler Hari Singh. After the Dogra raja left the state in Indian custody, the Pandits also began leaving Kashmir. Today they live in Jammu and are asking for a separate union territory called Panditdesh.


Peace is a two way street
Nehru’s commitment to the people of Kashmir
Kashmir & Junagarh are Pakistani territory
Kashmir: Does the article of accession exist?

Huge backlash against Zardari’s Kashmir statement. Pakistanis repudiate this treason and treasury ‘batt keh raheh gaa hindustaan—kashmir banaiga Pakistan

KASHMIR Junagarh & Manvadar Kashmir and Junagarh is Pakistani territory
Kashmir: Does the article of accession exist?
Northern Areas are part of Pakistan and were never part of Kashmir

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate this page on to one of these languages: Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Bookmark and Share Add to Technorati Subscribe to our RSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | November 30th, 2007 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ | Save/SharePost to MySpace!

Balauchistan: How it joined Pakistan

Balauchistan decided to remain part of Pakistan in a referendum held under the auspices of the Independence of India Act of 1947.

Baluchistan was part and parcel of the Indus Valley Civilization

The 5000 year old ancient trade routes between Pakistan and China are being revived with modern freeways that were ocnstructed 20 years ago. 5000 years ago the
The Geographic Two Nation Theory. Pakistan existed 5000 years ago as the “Indus Valley Civilization”

Pakistan exsited 5000 Years ago as the IVCThe Pakistan that existed 5000 years ago. The Balauch have lived with the Punjabis, Sindhis, Pathans, and Kashmiris for thousands of years. This alliance did not begin in recent history.

The Nationalist parties are boycotting the elections. As expected the MMA will lose votes, and the PPP or the PML(N) may pick up seats. There is a distinct possibility that the PML(Q) may also get some seats.We wish to start the story of Baluchistan many thousands of years ago–even before the Indus Valley.We wish to start the story of Baluchistan many thousands of years ago–even before the Indus Valley. 

We wish to start the story of Baluchistan many thousands of years ago–even before the Indus ValleyMehergarh situated strategically near the Bolan Pass, is located at the foot of the Balochistan hills on the Katchi plain southeast of Quetta. A 9000 year old site of settlement, Neolithic Mehergarh consists of four mounds. Supported by the Pakistan Department of Archeology, French archeologists have been carrying out extensive excavations there for some years. These excavations, studies and research have led to pushing back these settlements to some 9000 years.

Thus, the chronology of civilization in Pakistan, established through the study of Moenjodaro and Harappa, has been pushed back by over 4000 years. The habitation of the site has been divided into seven periods, the first being the Pre-Pottery Neolithic period that dates to circa 7000 B.C. or even earlier. The site was abandoned between 2000 and 2500 B.C. during a period of contact with the Indus Civilization and then reused as a burial ground for some time after 2000 B.C.

| PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | November 30th, 2007  | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape | RUPEE NEWS | Moin Ansari | November 30th, 2007  | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

Perhaps the most important feature of Mehrgarh is the fact that one can witness its gradual development from an early village society to a regional center that covered an area of 200 hectares at its height. In the course of this development, a huge platform that may reflect some form of authority was constructed at the site. Mehrgarh was also a center of manufacture for various figurines and pottery that were distributed to surrounding regions

Research shows that people here lived in houses and were involved in hunting, domesticating of animals and farming cereals like barley and wheat. This hunting-farming society developed gradually and their pursuits were creative. During the early period these people used stone and bone tools i.e. polished stone-axes, flint blades and bone-pointers. By 6000 B.C. the hand-made pottery appeared and in the 5th millenium B.C. Metallurgy and potter-wheel were introduced and they produced some fine terra-cotta figurine and pottery with exotic geometric designs.

Subsequently they produced and wore ornaments of beads, seashells and semi-precious stones like Lapis Lazuli. A museum has been set up at sibi where a wide range of rare finds from the site of mehergarh are on display.

Accessibility: Mehargarh is well connected by road, air and by train with the rest of the country by Quetta

The 5000 year old ancient trade routes between Pakistan and China are being revived with modern freeways that were ocnstructed 20 years ago. 5000 years ago the Harrappan Pakistanis were trading with the ChineseThe 5000 yeard old Pakistan as it interacted with the other 3 superpwoers

The ancient trade routes between Pakistan and China are being revived with modern freewaysThe Pakistani civilization interacted with many regions of the world

The history of Baluchistan is fascinating. Mehergarh is the oldest agricultural site in the Subcontinent. The artifacts found there go back 7000 years. The people of Mehargarh have been living peacfully with the Indus Valley Civilization for tousands of years. During the British colonial rule no such province existed. It is a merger of many independent states. At the end of the colonial era the Provinces of West India decided to band together and form Pakistan.

Timurs’ EmpireBaluchistan part of Pakistan part of Amir taimur’s empire

The British Empire does not even show half of PakistanThe British empire with hundreds of states in the Subcontinent

Presidencies 1893The British empire of 1857 in the Subcontinent without Baluchistan

Indian Empiure includes Ceylon, Burma, AfghanistanThe British Empire with Baluchistan and Afghanistan

This is a map of the state of Kalat. Some part of Baluchistan belonged to the British Government This is a map of the state of Kalat. Some part of Baluchistan belonged to the British Government

Kalat

India’s recalcitrance to join and China’s eager interest in the Iran Pakistan pipeline bodes well for the visionaries who wish to convert the Pakistan energy corridor into a reality. The introduction of China into the pipeline project is huge morale boost for Pakistan and places a hamper on the hard bargaining on transportation costs. China has the largest investment banks in the world, and with Chinese trade surpluses, the financing issues would evaporate in a nano-secondThe coast of Baluchistan

Afghanistan has been a problem for the world for the last 30 years. It is time to end this monstrosity. The solution to the turmoil in Afghanistan is to abolish the Durand Line, unite the Pashtuns, and initially absorb the Pashtun provinces into Pakistan. As a next step the Pakistani boundary should extend to the Amu Darya (Oxus). This will eliminate the need of NATO troops in Afghanistan, and save European and American lives.The maps of Pakistan

Brining peace to the areaAfghan boundryMany Pakhtuns today want to join Pakistan. They call this inevitable

The state of Kalat

In 1947-1948 there were only two choices before the Raja of Kashmir the leaders of FATA, NWFP, the Khan of Kalat and the Baluch leaders.

“Pakistan” existed 5000 years ago. It was not called “Pakistan”. China 5000 years ago was also called something else. Egypt 5000 years ago was called something else.Contrary to some of the revisionists who are rewriting history, Balauchistan’s 6 million people were not forcibly incorporated into Pakistan. The Baluchis have been living with the Indus Valley people for thousands of years.

Balauchistan decided to join Pakistan in a referendum held under the auspices of the Independence of India Act of 1947. 1. During the period of the British Raj, there were four Princely States in Balochistan: Makran, Kharan, Las Bela and Kalat, the largest and most powerful.

Constables 1893 British map showing Pakistan, Afghanistan, Burma, Ceylon, Nepal, Bhutan, Sikkim as part of “Indian Empire”The British “On to the Oxus policy” was short lived. In 1876 Sir Robert Sandeman concluded a treaty with the Khan of Kalat and brought his territories–including Kharan, Makran, and Las Bela–under British suzerainty.3. After the Second Afghan War of 1878-80, the Treaty of Gandamak concluded in May 1879, the Afghan Mmir ceded his districts of Pishin, Sibi, Harnai, and Thal Chotiali to the British.

Throughout history, the struggle for the independence of the Subcontinent has been struggle against centralism and the struggle has been waged to create for provincial autonomy. The Government of India Act of 1919 set out in clear terms the subjects which were to belong to the provincial sphere and those to the Central sphere. But both the Congress and the Muslim League boycotted the elections to the provincial and Central Legislatures held in November 1920 under the Act, because they felt that the Central vernment had still retained too much of power over the provinces.

1) It is ironic that jounalists that were are citizen of  colonial powers that still occupy countries in the Middle East, Caribbean and West Asia are discussing colonialism in one of its former colonies. Many of these are spreading lies and disinformation about Baulauchistan and Pakistan.

2) Some think that the history of the Subcontinent began when Lord Clive invaded Bengal. Actually the history of Baluchistan and the history of Pakistan begins 150,000 years ago in the Suan vallay where the first Pakistanis walked and swam in the Suan river.

3) Mehergarh is the oldest agricultural site in the Subcontinent. It is 7000 years old. The poeple of Mehergarh traded with the Kashmiris, Punjabis, Sindhis, and Pathans for thousands of years. Contrary to some of the revisionists who are rewriting history, Balauchistan’s 6 million people were not forcibly incorporated into Pakistan. The Baluchis have been living with the Indus Valley people for thousands of years.

4) The Indus Valley Civilization existed on the banks of the Indus in more or less Pakistan of today. This was 3500 BC or thereabouts.

5) Balauchistan and Pakistan were part of many empires in a seesaw between Kushan, Abdali, Greeks, Persians, Timur, Mughals, and the British.

6) The British “On to the Oxus policy” was short lived. In 1876 Sir Robert Sandeman concluded a treaty with the Khan of Kalat and brought his territories-including Kharan, Makran, and Las Bela-under British suzerainty.3. After the Second Afghan War of 1878-80, the Treaty of Gandamak concluded in May 1879, the Afghan Mmir ceded his districts of Pishin, Sibi, Harnai, and Thal Chotiali to the British.

7) Balauchistan and Pakistan were part of the British Empire. There are British military cantonments in Quetta, Zhob, Rawalpindi, Lahore, Peshawar, Karachi, Sialkot and other places. During the period of the British Raj, there were four Princely states in Balochistan: Makran, Kharan, Las Bela and Kalat. In 1876 Sir Robert Sandeman concluded a treaty with the Khan of Kalat and brought his territories – including Kharan, Makran, and Las Bela – under British suzerainty. After the Second Afghan War of 1878-80, the Treaty of Gandamak concluded in May 1879, the Afghan Emir ceded the districts of Quetta Pishin,Sibi, Harnai, and Thal Chotiali to the British. In 1883 the British leased the Bolan Pass, southeast of Quetta, from the Khan of Kalat on a permanent basis. In 1887 some areas of Balochistan were declared British territory. In 1893, Sir Mortimer Durand negotiated an agreement with Amir Abdur Rahman Khan of Afghanistan to fix the Durand Line running from Chitral to Balochistan to as the boundary between the Afghans and the British.

8) Balauchistan decided to join Pakistan in a referendum held under the auspices of the Independence of India Act of 1947. 1. During the period of the British Raj, there were four Princely States in Balochistan: Makran, Kharan, Las Bela and Kalat, the largest and most powerful.

11) In 1883 the British leased the Bolan Pass, southeast of Quetta, from the Khan of Kalat on a permanent basis,.5. In 1887 some areas of Balochistan were declared British territory.6. In 1893, Sir Mortimer Durand negotiated an agreement with Amir Abdur Rahman Khan of Afghanistan to fix thethe Durand Line running from Chitral to Balochistan to as the boundary between the Afghans and the British. 1920 British Raj

12) The Government of India Act, 1935, treated Kalat as an independent State and provides representation for it in the Federal Legislature. Kalat was not all of Baluchistan, it is part of Balauchistan.

13) In 1947, Kalat was ruled by Mir Ahmed Yar Khan. Indeed, the British had given many Princely States the choice of either India, or Pakistan during the immediate pre-partition period (though they were worried of having too many independent nations). The states in Balauchistan were: Makran, Kharan, Las Bela and Kalat

14) The Indian Independence Act, 1947 allowed the independent states to join either India or Pakistan. According to Indian Independence Act 1947 – Section II
Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of this section the territories of Pakistan shall be (a) the territories which on the appointed day, are included in the Provinces of East Bengal and West Punjab as constituted under the two following sections; (b) the territories which, at the date of the passing of this Act, are included in the Province of Sind and the Chief Commissioner’s Province of British Baluchistan; and (c) if, whether before or after the passing of this Act but before the appointed day, the Governor General declares that the majority of the valid votes cast in the referendum which, at the date of the passing of this Act, is being or has recently been held in that behalf under his authority in the North-West Frontier Province are in favour of representatives of that Province taking part in the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, the territories which, at the date of the passing of this Act, are included in that Province.

15) The people of Balauchistan, overwhelmingly voted to join Pakistan in a referendum that was held on June 30, 1947, to ascertain their wishes on this issue.

16) ABOUT THE BLA– a terror organization which is a creation of Indian RAW
BLA: A threat to International Peace. The BLA is a creation of Indian Intelligence agencies which are trying to create instability in the areas bordering Paksitan, Iran and Afghanistan

17) Balauchistan joined Pakistan as a result of the free will of the Muslims.

18) The Khan of Kalat acceded to Pakistan on March 27, 1948. Like Kalat, Hydrabad and Kashmir, hundreds of other states also had the choice of either joining India or Pakistan.

The present campaign to create issues in Pakistan is the same conspiracy that was tried by the USSR to impede the defeat of the USSR forces in Afghanistan.

Pakistan gained independence from the British legally and the boundaries were recognized by Brittan, and all the other members of the United Nations.

BaluchistanGwadar Port on the Baluch coast

| PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | November 30th, 2007  | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape | RUPEE NEWS | Moin Ansari | November 30th, 2007  | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

Attacking Pakistani nukes would be folly

Attacking Pakistan would be folly!

News reports confirm that RAW is planning an attack on Pakistan’s Nuclear intallations. The story doesn’t seem to die down. The Pakistan press is reporting that something is up. Where there is smoke there is fire. The threats cannot be ignored.  Apparently the Pakistani security agencies have received credible evidence that RAW is trying to create a flag in Pakistan. The scenario runs as follows:

1) Some nebulous and unknown group makes some outlandish statements about Pakistan’s Nuclear Program.

2) A group of hooligans attack civilians headed towards one of the Nuclear facilities in Rawalpindi or other place.

3) The International media jumps on the bandwagon and blows things totally out of proportion.

4) International pressure is organized to “prove” that Pakistan’s nuclear program is in jeopardy and must be secured by the thugs of the Security Council or other such agency.

Having deliberately fomented extremism and militancy in Pakistan, it is accused of manifold invented allegations. In line with their objectives Indo-US-Israeli nexus has launched a malevolent smear campaign since 2004 and the world has been fed with manufactured stories to portray Pakistan as the most dangerous country in the world. Pak army which is the custodian of nuclear arsenal is neither worried nor has raised any alarm bells or has sought any assistance from anyone for the safety of its nukes. On the contrary it has repeatedly been trying to allay motivated fears of USA and others that its safety system is foolproof. Whatever absurd stories in circulation manifest inner desire of our detractors to somehow steal our nukes. They want Pak leadership to put in an urgent request to take away nuclear weapons before they are lost to the Taliban. It is in line with this fanciful scenario that US analysts concoct bizarre stories and magnify Taliban threat and project our institutions in poor light.

A new story has now come to light that Indian and Israeli trainers in Afghanistan have imparted intense mission oriented training to a band of 750 terrorists belonging to Baitullah’s Tehrik-e-Taliban to carry out an attack on one or more of Pakistani nuclear installations under their direct supervision. Reportedly, modalities have been worked out with active connivance of CIA and dirty bombs have also been provided to the terrorists. The story is not new but has been made more sensational by adding spice of local Taliban and dirty bombs. Suicide bombers have already targeted ISI, FIA and anti-terror police HQ close to NESCOM building. Fake Taliban equipped with sophisticated weapons and technologies provided by their foreign patrons are already waging a war in greater part of NWFP where some nuclear installations are installed. In case such an attack takes place it would not come as a bolt from the blue. The world has already been conditioned for such an eventuality.

The idea is not to steal a nuclear weapon, which is simply impossible given the safety system in place. Real design is to create a sensation and authenticate their stance of vulnerability of Pak nukes and thus achieve multiple objectives. It would facilitate USA to move UN to either intervene and take over Pak nuclear arsenal, or allow US to shift it to a safe place outside Pakistan, or allow permanent placement of IAEA inspectors in Pakistan to monitor nuclear activities and inspect each and every defence oriented building on the pattern of Iraq under the plea of locating and safeguarding nuclear materials. Latter option would inhibit Chinese working in various projects. In case Pakistan resists, it will be subjected to harsh sanctions which it will not be able to bear given the fact that US controlled IMF has provided lifeline to Pakistan. Pakistan’s nuclear programme is a monstrosity for India, Israel and USA, which the trio is overly keen to defang and deprive Pakistan of its deterrence capability. Pakistan intelligence apparatus should further streamline its systems to offset such an eventuality. Pakistan should reassert its declared policy that onus of any attack on its nuclear installation would be entirely on India for which Pakistan reserves the right to react accordingly. 

There is precedence of such attacks. Israel attack the Iraqi nuclear plant at Osarik. It also destroyed a Syrian reactor last year. Bharat and Israeli jets tried to bomb Kahuta twice but were intercepted and the attack was aborted. Another attack on Pakistani nuclear facilities would be considered an act of war.

TAKING OUT PAKISTANI NUKES–Attacking a Major Non-NATO Alley (MNNA) and founding member of SEATO AND CENTO

Peace sign with Pakistani mapNATO defeat: Why 40 nations Can’t Deliver Peace in Afghanistan. Some lessons learned from Afghanistan and the Hindu Kush

Pakistan has a 10 division well trained and well equipped army, one of the most professional armies in the world. Most of the officers were trained in the UK, USA, and Australia etc.

The army has a centralized control with intense loyalty to the officer corps. More than 500,00 soldiers are in reserve, and like Israel all Pakistani high-schoolers (11th and 12th grades) are trained in basic two year military training called NCC (National Cadet Corp).

The army is armed to the teeth, with local arms production M-16, Kalashnikovs, missiles, tanks, nukes, heavy artillery, F-16s and  JF-17 Thunders. They also have one of the best missile programs in the world, better than that of India.”The Regime” consists of the army support, an elected National Assembly and Senate with representation of all the political parties including a heavy and intense presence of the MMA, PML and PPP opposition.

Now to eliminate all this would require a full scale invasion. 400,000 American soldiers and mercenaries (contractors) could not do it in Iraq, which has one fifth of the population and was sanctioned for ten years.Now let us talk about invading Pakistan. Whose army is going to do it? One will need at least two million soldiers to occupy the country partially, and no one in 5000 years has been able to hold it.

Pakistan rebounding from volatile events. It evaluated its dangerous geo political situation as well as a belligerent international atmosphere. The sons and daughters of Pakistan pledged “Never again” and developed a comprehensive strategy to be self-sufficient in her defense needs. It created a Nuclear deterrent, indigenous Al Khalid Tanks and a missile program that is the envy of South Asia. Neither the mercenaries sent from the across the border, not the blackmail can now harm the fabric of the country. 

Before the country is attacked many unnamed capitals and cities may go up in smoke, the Gulf of Hormuz would be blocked (ending supply of oil to the world), the Suez Canal would be choked, and many oilfields would be radio active for the next ten thousand years. This would mean the end of life as we know it. MAD (mutually assured destruction is the wave of the future). Any takers?

Peace is the only way. Let us build bridges of harmony and rethink the strategy of war and “taking out nukes”.

Bharat’s floating tub will cost $2 Billion

The ongoing saga of the refurbishment of “Admiral Gorshkov” has spolied relations between Delhi and Moscow for quiet some time. The Russians are sick and tired of revised requirements from Delhi and have repeatedly raised the price of the Air Craft Carrier that is to be delivered to Delhi in 2012. The deal has come to a breaking point on several occasions, only to be salvaged with Delhi agreeing to pay more money to Russia. President Medvedev who once left Delhi on short notice after failed negotiations is now pressing this shipyard to push the ship out as soon as possible. It is still not certain that the political pressure can overcome the technical problems faced by the Sevmash yard. A tale of two Air Craft Carriers

 

Medvedev in  Sevmash (Kremlin.ru)Medvedev in Sevmash (Kremlin.ru)
Head of the Sevmash yard in Severodvinsk in this week’s meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev admitted that his company had made several blunders in the reconstruction process of the aircraft carrier “Admiral Gorshkov”. The vessel, which has been bought by the Indian Navy, will at the earliest be completed in late 2012.

As previously reported by BarentsObserver, Sevmash has already admitted that the aircraft carrier is a loss project for the yard.

In the meeting with Medvedev, Sevmash General Director Nikolai Kalistratov confirmed that “very much work remains with the aircraft carrier” .

At the same time, Mr. Kalistratov criticized the Indians for having raised their requirements from Sevmash. –They wanted a Lada, and now they demand a Mercedes, he told the president. Aircraft carrier blunders: 2009-07-03

The original price has been tripled ($6a7 million to $2 Billion) and there is a sense that it might be increased again. The main reason for the increase in the price is the unrelenting expectations of the Bhrartis who now expect a tip of the line ship–even though they purchased a mothballed dilapated tub.

The Russian are probably sick and tired of the Indian demeanor who continue to bargain endlessly. In recent years, India has grown closer to the USA, and many defense deals may be in the offing. Cracks are showing the Indo-Russian alliance and a chagrined Russia is now charging market prices for the ship.

A mutipolar world and the realities of South Asia have made India realize that red is thicker than greenbacks. The Indian establishment always suspicious of the US is predisposed to the Red Bear. This week proved the old axiom that when Delhi sees trouble it runs to Moscow. The Kremlin seeking new allies hasn’t totally hugged India but it sure wants the Billions of Dollars New Delhi is about to spend on airplanes. to that end, India has agreed to about $2 Billion more to pay for an archaic Aircraft Career call Admiral Gorshkov. India is desperate for icons and symbols  of power.
India’s sole aircraft carrier, the 29,000 ton INS Viraat, is going to spend the next 16 months in a shipyard getting maintenance and upgrades, leaving India with no carrier capability. This was to have been avoided by the timely arrival (this year) of the refurbished Russian carrier, the 44,000 ton Gorshkov, as the INS Vikramaditya. Under this plan, the INS Viraat was to be retired in 2012, after 53 years service (for Britain and India). But now the INS Viraat will get its engine and hull refurbished, and its electronics upgraded, and possibly serve for another decade.

Meanwhile, India has agreed to pay an additional billion dollars to complete the delayed refurbishment of the Russian aircraft carrier Gorshkov. The Russians not only demanded more money, but also admitted that a labor shortage would delay delivery until 2012. An Indian shipyard team will try to get the carrier out of the Russian yards earlier, and will also keep an eye on quality control.

The Russians have also admitted that the project also suffers from shoddy workmanship. The Indians have lots of experience with this sort of thing in Russian weapons, and will try to catch mistakes before the ship gets to India, hopefully in two or three years, rather than four. The Indians will also help with reconstructing the blueprints for the ship, which were apparently lost, and that contributed to the delay as well.

The new deal will cost $2.5 billion. This includes the purchase of the Gorshkov, and Russian shipyards performing repairs, modifications and upgrades. Another $800 milliom is to be spent on aircraft, weapons and equipment. Building a Gorshkov type carrier today would cost about $4 billion, and take several years more. India is building another carrier, from scratch, but that 37,000 ton vessel won’t be ready until 2015.

The Admiral Gorshkov entered service in 1987, but was inactivated in 1996 (too expensive to operate on a post Cold War budget). The Indian deal was made in 2004, and the carrier was to be ready by 2008. But a year ago reports began coming out of Russia that the shipyard doing the work, Sevmash, had seriously miscalculated the cost of the project. The revised costs were more like $1.1 billion for the $700 million refurb. The situation proceeded to get worse, with Sevmash reporting ever increasing costs to refurbish the carrier.

The Indians were not happy, and at first insisted that the Russian government (which owns many of the entities involved) make good on the original deal. India sent its own team of technical experts to Russia, and their report apparently confirmed what the Russians reported, about shipyard officials low-balling the cost of the work needed. This is a common tactic for firms building weapons for their own country. It gets more complicated when you try to pull that sort of thing on a foreign customer. The Russian government will cover some of the overrun cost. The Sevmash managers who negotiated the low bid are being prosecuted.

Once refurbished, the Gorshkov, renamed INS Vikramaditya, should be good for about 30 years of service. That’s because, after the refit, 70 percent of the ships equipment will be new, and the rest refurbished. India Left Naked by James Dunnigan April 22, 2008

Though it cannot afford to, but Delhi wants to play in the big leagues. India will pay $2 billion for an antique aircraft carrier designed for 1980s. It is a shame that Indian navy got a piece of junk made look nice for $2 billion. India agreed to a $1.5 billion package deal signed in January 2004 for Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov. It was Pranab Mukherjee, the Indian foreign minister and then defense minister who initiated the deal with the Russians. Now India has shell out as much as $2 billion more to Russia to get aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov by end-2012. The final cost is expect to be around $3 Billion. Actually the deal may nver go through. Many analysts believe that the Russians don’t want to sell the Admiral Gorshkov to Delhi.

Russian woos Pakistan with arms and joint military strategy

There are several questions that are being asked. Why have the Bhartis surround a Russian military cargo aircraft AB-24? What is going on? Why did a Russian plane inadvertnanly or advertently stray into Indian territory from Pakistan. Why did the US supply Pakistan with Russian MI-17 helicpters? Why were they being transported to Pakistan on a Russian plane. Why was the plane then arrested by Delhi which forced it to land in Bharat (aka India)

Is Russia secretly helping Pakistan? Has Moscow made a deal with Pakistan to supply it with more choppers hidden among the US choppers?

The Pakistan Russian relationship is growing by leaps and bounds. Pakistan has applied to the SCO and Russia may allow it to join the Shanghai Club. In June, in an unprecedented move the Russian Prime Minister expressed solidarity and sympathy with Pakistan.

“I would like to pass on my sincere sympathy and support to the relatives, and wish for a speedy recovery to all those injured in the tragic events in Peshawar” Russian President Medvedev

“We believe that this organization is an important platform for strengthening trust and regional security, and contributing to economic cooperation,”  Pakistani President Zardari

Russian Dmitry MedvedevFor Pakistan, one of the seminal events of the year was not the SCO conference but what went on the sidelines. The most important meeting for Islamabad was the meeting with the Russian Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. Iit is pedagogical to note the positive assurances given by the Russian Prime Minister Mr. Putin to Pakistan. The very positive statements about Pakistan came in the aftermath of the Shivajee like embrace of Mr. Manmohan Singh, who during the embrace with the great Khan stabbed him in the heart. Mr. Manmohan Singh also threw an insult at Mr. Zardari during the first peace meeting in a few years. 

  • June 22nd, 2009 Genral Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, discussed  enhancing ties between armies of the two countries with General Vladimir Boldyrev, Commander-in-Chief Russian ground forces.
  • June 10 2009: (RIA Novosti) – Russia is ready to provide Pakistan with assistance in its fight against terrorism, President Dmitry Medvedev
  • Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari told a Russian business daily his country wants to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. RIA Novosti
  • June 16 (APP) – Pakistan and Russia on Monday vowed to open a “new chapter” in their relationship with joint collaborative efforts to boost their economic ties

Medvedev said Russia would like to develop a full-fledged bilateral relationship with Pakistan in a congenial atmosphere and hoped Zardari’s visit would open a new chapter in the bilateral relations between the two countries. According to Zardari, the world had changed a lot in the last decade, making it imperative for nations to be inter-dependent to face the multifarious challenges that lay ahead.

He said it was collective responsibility, specially of close and even extended neighbours to help each other in dealing with the issues their countries are facing. Noting that Pakistan was in Russia’s extended neighbourhood, Zardari said: The time has come to address regional issues collectively.

The two leaders also discussed the situation in the region, with a focus on building a strong relationship and for coordinated efforts in countering terrorism, drug trafficking and syndicated crime. News Web India

It is indeed an event of great importance when the former antagonists meet diplomatically. It is worthy of headlines when the military leaders of former protagonists meet to discuss arms and military strategy. The meeting could have been ignored by Political Scientists as a “one off” discussion, but it is actually a prelude to a new vehicle that has been created to bring Afghanistan-Pakistan and Russia together. Moscow will host a trilateral meeting of the three countries which have been a love-hate embrace for three decades.

MOSCOW: Chief of Army Staff General (COAS), Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, who is on an official visit to Russia, met General Vladimir Boldyrev, Commander-in-Chief Russian ground forces. During meeting the matters of professional interest with particular reference to enhancing ties between armies of the two countries, were discussed.

COAS also called on Mr Victor Zavarzin, Chairman of Defence and Security Committee of State Duma and discussed with him the matters pertaining to regional security and common interest. Mr Victor Zavarzin, Chairman of Defence and Security Committee expressed the Russian desire to further enhance strategic relationship with Pakistan.

Later, COAS also met deputy foreign minister of Russia. Both sides expressed the desire to seize new opportunities arising out of the current challenges confronting the region and the world. There was a keen desire on both sides to tangibly move forward to establish a strong and robust partnership between each other. The Chief of Army Staff, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani also visited the tomb of unknown soldiers and laid a floral wreath. COAS also attended an official Dinner hosted in his honour by General Vladimir Bolyrev, Commander in Chief Russian ground forces.

Pakistan has not had good relations with Russia since 1947 and before. During the British Raj Lord Curzon had tried to push back the Russian Bear. Moscow and the British fought the “great game” in Afghanistan. In the 70s Russia set up a steel mill for Pakistan which was a giant leap for Pakistani industry. During the 80s when Russia invaded Kabul, Pakistan was the first to begin the war against the aggressor. Since 2001, relations have begun to improve. In 2004 Russia’s top battle tank plant signed a production deal with Pakistan, a day after the country’s Foreign Minister Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri held talks with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov.

The President said Pakistan and the Russian Federation were facing similar problems of terrorism and extremism and both need to have extended cooperation to fight this menace with increased collaborative efforts. The two leaders were of the view that both Pakistan and Russia were located in a region that provides an enabling environment for intra and inter-regional trade, boost cooperation in energy, joint ventures in infrastructure development and investment opportunities.

Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi later told APP that Russia was an important country of the region, with an equally vital role in Asia and Europe, and Pakistan was desirous of having an enhanced relationship with it. He said Russia was also an important player and has its clout on various groups in Afghanistan and can play an important role in resolving the Afghan issue. He said the trilateral summit with Afghanistan was being held on Russian initiative.

President Zardari said Pakistan highly values its relations with Russia and said the two countries share common views and perception on many global issues. The President hoped that the trade ties between the two countries would further improve in the days ahead. The two countries, that recently celebrated their 60th anniversary of establishment of diplomatic relations, have seen a sharp increase in trade from US$ 100 million in 2002 to over US$ 500 million in 2007. APP

In 2007, the relations between Pakistan and the Russian Federation were resurrected by Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov after the 3-day official visit of Russian to Islamabad. He became  the first Russian prime minister to visit Pakistan in 38 years. President Musharraf had deliberately tried to improve relations with Moscow. He had “in-depth discussions” with the Russians. They tried to improve bilateral relations with particular attention on  economic ties. Two Memorandum of understanding were signed between the two countries. The Russian Federation promised to cooperate with Pakistan Railways for construction of new railway tracks, supply of sleepers and signaling system, up-gradation of a railway workshops and setting up of Metro Railways in major cities of Pakistan. Under another MOU, the two countries will work for promoting cultural, educational and scientific changes. This new discussion is of particular importance because of the military angle.

Mumbai: A Russian military cargo aircraft AB-24 with six passengers and two crew members on Friday night intruded into Indian airspace from Pakistan and landed at the international airport out. As the plane entered into Indian airspace without the right code, it was escorted to Mumbai airport by Indian Air Force planes, a spokesman of Mumbai International Airport Limited spokesman told PTI here.

The MIAL spokesman said the plane with Russian markings came from Pakistani airspace carrying six passengers and two crew members and was escorted over the Mumbai airport by IAF planes. The cargo aircraft landed at the airport at around 2240 hours after being allowed by the Air Traffic Control. Security forces have surrounded the aircraft. Source: PTI

As a result of the 2007 meeting, Russia allowed China to export 500 WD-93 engines for the JF-17 Thunder jets. This enabled Pakistan to construct a squadron of the JF-17 Thunders. The new meeting may allow export of Russian technology for Pakistan’s latest venture, salellites and the J-10B. Pakistan needs more powerful engines for its next generation of jets and Russia will be providing them to Pakistan. Additionally Russia may assist Paksitan in upgrading the Steel Mill and in improving railway system. Pakistan wants to hook up Gwader to Central Asia with a state of the art rail system.

The four Russian-made helicopters are owned by the U.S. Army. Two are at Ramstein Air Base in Germany and two are in Slovakia . They will be flown to Pakistan on a Russian-made AN- 124 aircraft, one of the world’s largest transports, according to the officials. They said they didn’t know who owned this plane, a model used by private transport companies worldwide.Pakistan also has about 32 U.S. Cobra gunships in its inventory. The MI-17 can perform more missions than the Cobra, which is primarily designed to fire air-to-ground missiles, the officials said.The operation is being organized by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, which manages Pentagon foreign military sales. Asian Defense. Tony Capaccio

Russia has been providing Choppers to Pakistan which have been flown secretly into Pakistan on the AN-124 aircraft.

The Pakistanis got the Russian weapons as a support in the fight against gangs. Four military helicopters were delivered to Pakistan. The Military Department of Pakistan stated that the helicopters will be used to evacuate the inhabitants from the territory of military activities.

Earlier Pakistan government asked the USA for the military support in the activity against terrorism. The support came two weeks later and the delivery of the helicopters was also done by the USA. It still remains unknown why the USA exported Russian helicopters. But the holding company “Russian Helicopters” confirmed the information. Source: www.lenta.ru

Pakistan appreantly has a preference for Russian choppers becuase of their robust performance as well as reliability. Pakistan also does not want to be tied into US equipment and for the past decade has been difersifying its arms.

Pakistani owned Russian M-17 chooper

The MI-17 is a medium-weight helicopter, capable of carrying troops, performing medical evacuations and carrying out ground attacks. The four helicopters may be delivered as soon as June 8, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity.Pakistan ’s military already is using MI-17s and “has found these platforms to be very useful in their current counter-insurgency operations,” said Alan Kronstadt, a Pakistan expert with the non-partisan Congressional Research Service.Pakistan ’s leaders “urgently requested” that the U.S. provide more “to fill the gap created by the ongoing refurbishment” of its existing fleet. Asian Defense. Tony Capaccio

Pakistani cricket victory celebrated in Srinagar, Nottingham & the world

The cacophony of horns on the streets of Nottingham mingled in with Pakistan Zindabad went on deep into the night. it was a sea of green tops and green flags in downtown Srinagar. The Crescent and Star fluttered atop truck and cars all across Indian Occupied Kashmir, in Azad Kashmir and of course in the land of the pure. It wasn’t just Sunday, it was the entire week that the cities of Leeds, Bradford and Nottingham were in a frenzy of Pakistani Cricket. Jeeway Pakistanresounded from the cars, the restaurant and the streets. Be Afridi, very Afridi was the slogan heard all over Britain and in Pakistan. Lahore was roaring with “Gul sadda sher eh, baqi hair phair eh“. Karachi the heart of Pakistani cricket was celebrating from Clifton to Landi, from Defence to North Nazimibad.

Britain Cricket Twenty20 World Cup

ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari congratulated the national cricket team on Sunday for winning the T20 World Cup in London and announced an award of Rs1 million each for Captain Younus Khan and Man of the Match Shahid Afridi and Rs500,000 each for other players. Dawn

Good cricket fans say the best cricket on the planet on the brown mud pitches of Lords. The Pakistani fans were a pleasure to watch. The Crescent and Stat waived high in the stadium and around it.

Runners-up last time, Pakistan went one better in the midsummer sunshine at Lord’s, winning the World Twenty20 by eight wickets with eight balls to spare. Guardian

The Pakistanis have reinvented the latest version of Cricket in their own image. When 20Twenty came around, the pundits said that it was a game for the batsmen and that 20Twenty had proclaimed the death of the bowler. The genre invented by Sarfraz Nawaz, Imran Khan, Waqar Unis has now again been updated by Umar Gul, Afridi and other teenagers. They wreaked havoc on the most sophisticated and experienced batsmen on the planet. The South Africans didn’t know what hit them, and the proud Kiwis were totally stumped. Sri Lanka came in afraid of the Afridi-Gul juggernaut, and never quiet got a grip on the game.

ISLAMABAD (AP) — Thousands of fans have taken to the streets across Pakistan to celebrate their country’s eight-wicket victory over Sri Lanka in the Twenty20 World Cup final.

The rejoicing started as batsman Shahid Afridi steered Pakistan to the title with an unbeaten 54 off 40 balls, with his team chasing down the target of 139 runs in 18.4 overs.

Captain Kumar Sangakkara scored an unbeaten 64 off 52 balls and helped Sri Lanka recover from 70-6 to finish with 138-6 off its 20 overs.

Giant screens were put in place in the main markets of Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad and Multan where thousands of men, women and children gathered to watch the final live from Lord’s in London. Sports illustrated

Cricket thinktanks will be spending years going over Reverse Spins. How did the Pakistani teenagers create this deadly mix of Yorkers, Spins, and then of course the Reverse Spins.

Two teams blessed with sublime and inventive skills will contest the World Twenty20 final today. The arrival at Lord’s of Pakistan and Sri Lanka should also be the final vindication of a form of the game that has not quite persuaded those who regard themselves as purists of its legitimacy.

But in the past fortnight, Twenty20 cricket has come of age while retaining the idealism and freshness of youth. It has demonstrated – not least through the two wonderful sides which have reached the final – that bowlers have a significant part to play in the construction and destiny of matches and that batting is not merely a less thuggish type of slogging.

The tournament has been entertaining and diverting. T20 is not Test cricket, it cannot be, nor ever will it be. But it contains a beauty and vigour of its own. The lack of close matches has hardly been noticed. Independent

For decades the gurus will be analyzing the all round efforts of  Afridi. Everyone compared the victory to 1992 win when Imran Khan’s team lifted the World Cup by beating England in the final at the Melbourne cricket ground in Australia.The win by Younus Khan’s team gave Pakistanis back home reason to cheer as the cricket-mad nation celebrated and cherished the victory.

Celebrations in Indian occupied Kashmir after Pakistan win

Pakistan Cricket Twenty20 World Cup

SRINAGAR, India (AFP) — Residents in Indian-ruled Kashmir Sunday fired crackers in the region’s main city after Pakistan beat Sri Lanka to win the World Twenty20 championship, witnesses said.

Srinagar — the Kashmiri summer capital — erupted in celebration after Pakistan beat Sri Lanka by eight wickets and as scores of Kashmiri youth poured on to the streets and lit firecrackers.

The youths also chanted pro-Pakistan and pro-freedom slogans as Indian paramilitary troops stayed in their bunkers, witnesses said.

Thousands of Kashmiris, including women and children, were glued to their televisions sets to watch the tense final.

“It is a great victory and one day I hope we will merge with Pakistan,” said a die-hard Pakistani cricket fan, Mohammed Yaseen.

Residents in Muslim-majority Kashmir valley traditionally support Pakistan in sports events.

Indian Kashmir is in the grip of a nearly 20-year insurgency that has so far claimed more than 47,000 lives by an official count.

Islamabad denies Indian allegations that it funds and arms the insurgency. Most militant groups want Indian-ruled Kashmir to merge with Pakistan, and a few want the region to become independent. AFP

pakistan-sir-lanka Kashmiri women

Pakistan won and won decisively. The question being asked around the world is did the IPL hurt Cricket in general and Bharati cricket in particular.

From the looks of it, the IPL did hurt Bharat. We wrote several weeks ago, “Don’t call IPL Cricket”. That seems to the gist of it all. IPL was a show, a carnival, a dating scene, a “mela“, a Bollywood production, a bazaar, a fashion parade, an excuse to get drunk, a food cafeteria a show–but surely it did not represent Cricket. The results of the 20Twenty World Cup surely informed the world that IPL did not sharpen the skills of the players, it did the exact opposite, it reduced the  power of the batsmen and the bowlers.

Celebrations in Islamabad

Celebrations in Islamabad

The commentary on the Pakistani win was very biased. The Guardian, the Independent and the New York Times focused on Pakistani issues at home, but did not mention the issues faced by Sri Lanka or Bharat.

It was so very typical of Pakistan then that the most influential players in the game were a pair of mavericks. Afridi is an entertainer by nature, a robust player touched with magic. His bowling, fast wrist spin, has been superb throughout but it is his batting that has helped change fortunes, persuading Malik to promote him to No3 in the order and responding, first against South Africa and now Sri Lanka. His was a more measured innings than his reputation as a thunderous hitter of sixes might suggest: there was much running to do and clearly that does not agree with him. But when the time came he rammed down the accelerator, belted Muttiah Muralitharan high into the Tavern Stand and then over extra cover, and sealed things. He batted for 40 balls and hit two fours and two sixes. Guardian

Diamer Bhasha to usher in prosperity and development

After a delay of about a decade the the 272 meter high, the largest Roller Compacted Concrete Dam in the world  is going to be built in the Northern Areas of Pakistan. The dam will have the multiple purpose of creating electricity, conserving water,  supporting agriculture, creating commerce, increasing tourism, managing floods, as well as well as generating employment.  Several large multinational conglomerates are bidding for the project. From the looks of it the Chinese will have a good shot at it.

  • Indus Water Treaty, Kalabagh, Kashmir, & Gurdaspur
  • Indian Aqua bomb-Pakistan’s future water wars in Kashmir
  • Indus Water Treaty, Kalabagh, Kashmir, & Gurdaspur
  • The Kalabagh Dam protoypeThe Kalabagh Dam and the five rivers with the proposed dams The Kalabagh Dam dropped without discussion in parliament
  • Water wars: India attacks Pakistan with Water again-flash floods 57 villages
  • According the Indus Water treaty, Bharat had access to Sutlej Beas and Ravi and Pakistan was given Indus Chenab and Jhelum. However Bharat has violated the treaty by building dams, and other structures on the Pakistani rivers. By building illegal dams on Pakistan rivers, Bharat wants to control Pakistani waters. On several occasions in the past few years, Bharat has stopped the flow of waters to Pakistan. It has also flooded dozens of Pakistani villages by releasing waters without warning. Three Georges Dam Corporation of China among bidders for Basha Dam

    Both Mangla and Tarbelacwere built during the brilliant decade of development–the golden years of Pakistani development. He also created the Small Dams Corporation and negotiated the take over Gwader from the Sultanate of Oman. Building Mangla and Tarbela provided huge employment to a large section of the population and created construction and architectural skills which helped in the construction of small dams like Rawal, Warsak and many hundreds of others. It also produced abundant hydro electricity which allowed Pakistan to electrify thousands of villages across the land of the Indus. Dams were built in Azad Kashmir, Sarhad, Sindh, and Balauchistan. Punjab built something like 32 small dams which helped it water management and fighting water logging and salinity.

    Mangla and Tarbela dam
    Mangla and Tarbela dam

    The Ecnec will also take up upgrading of the Karakorum Highway for Bhasha Dam that will cost Rs 12.058 billion in accordance with the revised estimates. The federal government has allocated Rs 100 million for this project during the ongoing fiscal year 2008-09.

    The upgrading of the Karakorum Highway will be completed in three years, from 2008 to 2011. With the help of this project, 258-km-long section from 6.1m to 2 lane 7.3m width, 2m shoulders, including 49 bridges 700 culverts and 57 causeways, will be constructed.

    This project is aimed at facilitating transportation of plant, machinery, heavy equipment like turbine runner of 5.5m dia for construction of Bhasha Dam and it will also increase tourism and trade with China. By Mehtab Haider. The Dawn

    The last big dam built in Pakistan was Tarbela built jointly by the Italians and a conglomerate of other countries. Previous to that the Mangla Dam was built by the Americans. At the time, the US had a lot of experience in building dams. Since Tarbela, China has built the Three Gorges dam, the largest dam complex on the planet, and probably equivalent to the 8th wonder of the world. Pakistan is planning to construct six humongous dams and the hope is that after the completion of the Diamer Bhasha dam enough Civil Engineers will be available to construction the other five dams indigenously.

    The Kalabagh Dam location map of Pakistan
    The Kalabagh Dam location map of Pakistan

    ISLAMABAD: The construction of Diamer-Bhasha Dam would be started this year and a sum of Rs. 8000 million has been allocated in the recently announced federal budget, Federal Minister for Water and Power, Raja Pervez Ashraf said Thursday.

    The Minister said the construction of this dam would ensure green revolution in the country by producing power generation 4500 MW as well as water storage 6.4 MAF which would contribute for meeting demand of electricity and water for irrigation of thousands of acre land of the country per annum.

    Regarding beginning of the construction, the Minister said that the construction of the Dam would begin by the end of the this year may be September or October according to the scheduled finalized for the project. The Wapda authorities have already been directed to follow the schedule to ensure given time frame for the completion of the mega project, the Minister said and added that Wapda is working to complete the resettlement plan for the affectees of the Dam site belonging to Northern Areas and NWFP.

    The plan to continue to build new dams in Pakistan bodes well for the agriculture of the country and the region. Many countries of the world are investing in food security. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have been buying land in Pakistan, Sudan and even Somalia. the purpose of these huge farms is to ensure a constant supply of food to the countries. The Gulf purchases $200 Billion worth of food items. Pakistan is poised to take advantage of this huge market.

    The original “Green Revolution” is dead. A new one needs to be resurrected all across Asia. China has been at the vanguard of this movement. A seminal reason behind the dispute over Kashmir is water. Kashmir is the origin point for many rivers and tributaries of the Indus River basin. They include Jhelum and Chenab which primarily flow into Pakistan while other branches – the Ravi, Beas and the Sutlej irrigate northern India. Pakistan has been apprehensive that in a dire need India under whose portion of Kashmir lies the origins and passage of the said rivers, would use its strategic advantage and withhold the flow and thus choke the agrarian economy of Pakistan. The Boundary Award of 1947 meant that the headworks of the chief irrigation systems of Pakistan were left located in Indian Territory.

    After the construction of these dams and irrigation canals, cropping intensity and crop yield have increased. Due to availability of irrigation water there has been a shift of cropping pattern from wheat and forage crops to vegetable crops. Farmers are earning up to $2433 per ha per year. An analysis of inflow–outflow of the dams shows that, if properly managed, the storage is sufficient to irrigate all the crop lands within the command area. The depth to the water table has also decreased since the dams were constructed. The water table varies from 6 to 15 m in the irrigated areas served by the Khasala dam as compared to 7–39 m before the dam was constructed. The water table depths for the areas served by the Jawa dam ranged from 7 to 39 m before the dam was constructed to 9–25 m after construction. The shallower water table has made the groundwater accessible and as a result the number of wells has increased. This has reduced drudgery on the local inhabitants particularly for women who had to fetch water from far away for their domestic uses…M. Ashraf, a, , M.A. Kahlowna and A. Ashfaqa. Impact of small dams on agriculture and groundwater development: A case study from Pakistan. aPakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, Khyaban-e-Johar Road H-8/1, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    The Mangla Dam was built by the Americans. At the time Americans were in Mangla and also in Badabare Air Force base near Peshawar. After President Ayub Khan wanted Americans as “Friends Not Masters”, he allowed an open bidding process for the next dam. Tarbela was built by a joint Italian conglomeration. Successive governments did not continue the marvelous water policy of President Ayub Khan. The next dams, Basha, Kalabgh and others did not materialize. General Zia Ul Haq canceled the dams, abolished the Small Dams Corporation and canceled the Indus Highway that would have opened up much of Baluchistan to travel, traffic and development. The Benazir and Nawaz Sharif governments remained mired in inter-provincial rivalry which prevented the dam building. Benazir to her  opened up the energy sector to oil burning expensive power plants. There was a time during her tenure when Pakistan was thinking of exporting to surplus electricity to other countries. The massive electrification campaign during the tenure of President Musharraf did not keep pace with the supply of electricity. The GNP doubled, and the use of electricity went up dramatically. A feasibility study was completed on Basha and Kalabagh by the Chinese companies. President Musharraf started the process  did not start the construction.

    Indus water Treaty
    Indus water Treaty

    Pervez Ashraf said that the generation of 4,500 MW inexpensive hydel power from Diamer-Bhasha dam would reduce the dependence on thermal power resulting saving of huge foreign exchange and make available 6.4 MAF of water for irrigation. He said that the project would also create massive infrastructure and job opportunities leading to the overall socio- economic uplift of the area.

    Responding to a question about the land acquisition and resettlement of the dam site affectees, the Minister said that the ECNEC had already approved the project for land acquisition and resettlement of the dam at a cost of about Rs. 60 billion.

    The Diamer-Bhasha Dam is being build at Indus River near Chilas area of Northern Areas having some portion lies in the area of District Kohistan of NWFP. The construction on the project will begin in September this year and it will be completed with in a period of seven year. Significantly, Diamer Bhasha Dam Project will be the highest Roller Compacted Concrete Dam in the world with height of 272 meters. Pakistan Times. Diamer-Bhasha dam to bring green revolution, ’Pakistan Times’ Metro Desk

    All kudos to the Zardari government for continuing the process on the Diamer Bhasha dam. Pakistan needs dozens of large dams and hundreds of small dams. During the great depression, the US government created job corp programs where youth were given employment to build huge infrastructure projects across the country. Many dams including the Hoover Dam were built at the time. The Tennessee Valley Authority was instrumental in the development of the Southwest because not only did it provide employment and energy, it opened up vast new areas for agriculture and industrialization.

    The Water wars have already begun and Bharat has already exploded the Aqua Bomb. The Indus Waters Treaty, signed on September 19, 1960, sets up a legal regime determining the rights and obligations of both parties concerning the use of the waters of the Indus basin. The World Bank is a signatory to the treaty for certain specified purposes. It is not a guarantor of the treaty. Under the treaty, use of the rivers Sutlej, Beas and Ravi, termed the eastern rivers, has been allocated to India while Pakistan is entitled to unrestricted use of the rivers, Indus, Jhelum and Chenab. India can only interfere with the flow of the western rivers for the following uses: domestic use, non-consumptive use, (navigation, flood control, fishing and wildlife), agricultural use and generation of hydroelectric power and storage works.

    Failure of Manmohan Singh’s complaint diplomacy

    The failure of the rude Manmohan Singh’s “complain diplomacy”

    The white dowager’s brown servant delivered the Brahmin message in the manner it had been scripted. The way Mr. Manmohan Singh greeted Mr. Asif Zardari not only shocked the demure Mr. Zardari, the rudeness has reverberated beyond the Urals, down the Himalayas to the Sea of Karachi. The entire planet knows that Mr. Singh is a seat warmer for the younger Gandhi the real power and the Premier in waiting. Everyone knows that “monkey say monkedo” is the culture of the Rashpati Bhavan where bags of money decide “elections”. The world heard the puppet Prime Minister regurgitate what the Sonia and the Nehru clan had told him to say. Like a juvenile toddler in his terrible two’s Mr. Singh was seen as a spoilt toddler jumping up and down complaining after he has lost his favorite teddy. The temper tantrum impressed no one. Perhaps Mr. Singh has gone senile and forgot where he was.  The septugarian Premier was behaving as if he was showing up at a schoolyard brawl after being told by the headmistress to repeat a certain line. It was seen for what it was worth, “Complaint diplomacy” at its worst.

    ‘I am happy to meet you but my mandate is to announce that the territory of Pakistan must not be used for terrorism,’

    The Cadet College bred Mr. Zardari who has spent a decade in prison knew quite well how to respond to the rudeness and cheap shots. He bit his lip and didn’t vocalize what he really wanted to say “Same applies to you m*******” scu*** b***, or “this coming from a sorry exscuse of a puppetwho has stopped our water‘, “don’t try to obfuscate your support for the terrorirsts, just call the dogs off in Swat“,  ”if you came out of your Ashram you would see that Paksitan soldiers are fighting your terrorists in Swat” or “we know how you are supplying the BLA“, or “we still remember your Mukti Bahni”, or “you should stick to what you do best ’seat warming‘…or a host of other thoughts which went through his mind, which even we can’t pen down.

    Mr. Zardari didin’t do the obvious “eenth ka jawab pathar seh“. He took the Sindhi route. He knew Mr. Singh was playing for the peanut gallery. Mr. Zardari smiled knowingly, and then showed his personal hospitality and stature by waving his hand and showing Mr. Manmohan Singh the way towards the sitting room.

    As he was walking to his seat Mr. Zardari must have had empathy for the old man in front of him. Gurmukh Singh and Amrit Kaur would be really disappointed in you Mr. Singh. Seems like you your Oxbridge education has been wasted. Your birthplace in the heartland of hospitality of Gah (Chakwal District), of Pakistani Punjab surely disowns you for good reason. You have no manners. Mr. Zardari’s  snicker was worth a thousand pages. He too was warming the seat for a younger prince, but at least, he was doing it for his own flesh and blood, not for a half breed from Italy.

    Mr. Zardari for all his faults and weaknesses, has a strength, he stays cool  a cucumber. By ignoring the claptrap, Mr. Zardari exposed the shallowness of Mr. Singh’s personality. Mr. Zardari’ mature sagacity overwhelmed the cheap crack that Mr. Singh was told to deliver. On further analyzing the rehearsed, cryptic and terse statement of Mr. Singh, one can see the frustration felt by Bharat who was told by Mr. Obama to withdraw troops from the Pakistani border and shut down the Bharati consulates in Afghanistan or at least pare them down. The world is not buying Delhi’s script on Mumbai, and the entire world has told Delhi that it doesn’t need dozens of Consulates in Afghanistan. Mr. Singh’s “complaint diplomacy” hasn’t worked with China and hasn’t worked with the USA. What makes him think that it will work with Pakistan. His  wailing is alike a boy, calling wolf all the time, is now seen in diplomaticd circles as a personal weakness– his hollow public posturing has been a disgusting failure.

    Of course the drama and feigned tight lipped smiles were for the cameras, but no one was fooled. it was obvious that the US State Department had brought Mr. Singh to the negotiating table, not kicking and screaming, but certianly with an arm twisted behind his back.

    Mr. Zardari did not want to be seen as the spoiler. The world wanted Bharat and Pakistan to be all “lovy dovey”. If this gets the Bharati army out of Kashmir, one can bear the unpleasantness of shaking hands of  slimy characters. His attitude was “whatever“. If I have to take a shower afterwards, so be it, but I won’t show my disgust at shaking the hands of Mr. Singh–at least not in public.

    Once in the privacy of his own quarters, away from the earshot, Mr. Zardari made it very clear to the Premier that this public posturing needs to be matched with concrete steps on the ground. He reinforced what Mr. Obama had written to Mr. Singh. “Stop the nefarious activities being carried out by the Bharati Consulates in Afghanistan”.

    The Pakistani reporters all over the world are in total shock at the attitude of the Bharati (aka Indian) Premier. In the interests of diplomacy, the Pakistani team didn’t pay Mr. Singh in kind. Pakistan seeks peace with India as an equal partner, not as a reward for good behaviour

    “Foreign Minister denied that Singh’s tough words set the meeting off on a negative front, according to Reuters, saying ‘I would look at it differently, I think it is a positive development the fact that the two leaders are meeting for the first time, on the sidelines of the SCO summit, since the tragic Mumbai incident. I think it is a positive development.’Dawn/Agencies/AFP

    The rudeness meant for public consumption was indeed a reaction to the strong pressure placed on Delhi for the resumption of the fruitless talks. This is Lucknow and obviously Mr. Singh doesn’t have pre-requisites to be treated like a gentleman.  No one understand why the Pakistani attitude was defensive and apologetic. Appeasement doesn’t get peace. Kowtowing doesn’t end war. Mr. Mahmud Qureshi has to take some pills to grow a backbone or the Pakistanis will find someone who has grit and steel.

    The foreign minister went on to tell APP that the two sides had agreed to talks between the foreign secretaries of the two countries, saying ‘In the meeting, Pakistan would apprise India about the steps it took against terrorism and would also discuss to address the Indian concerns in this regard.

    Peace is always in the mutual interest of parties tied up in conflict. One party does not do the other party any favors. It is the height of arrogance to convey the impression that peace talks are a reward for good behavior of one party. By portraying Pakistan as the guilty party, Delhi sabotages any prospect for peace. If the Americans and the Russians can smoke the peace pipe, so can the Indians and the Pakistanis–however it has to be done on the basis of dignity and mutual respect, not diktat and dictation.

    It is obvious the US pressure has forced Delhi to withdraw its occupation forces from Kashmir. Delhi is chagrined that it had to comply to American “requests”, and it is now dramatizing this defeat by issuing strange undiplomatic statements.

    Former senior diplomats close to the foreign policy establishment here say that back-channel negotiations on Kashmir — the contested border territory that is the central dispute between the two nations — are set to begin again, something the United States has quietly urged.

    Such behind-the-scenes talks came close to reaching a blueprint of an agreement on the decades’ old dispute while Gen. Pervez Musharraf was Pakistan’s president... New York Times

    Even the New York Times, known for its Anti-Pakistan stance acknowledged, though begrudgingly admitted the failure of the Bharati “Complaint diplomacy”. Of course one could never expect an unbiased article from Sengupta but it does have kernels worth mentioning.

    “Quarrels with Pakistan limits perceptions of India outside,” said Salman Haidar, a retired Indian diplomat and a former foreign secretary, the highest civil service post in the diplomatic service. “It makes India look stuck. It’s not floating.”Lydia Polgren, Somini Sengupta, Published: June 16, 2009. Hint of a Thaw for India and Pakistan

    Mr. Singh has failed in all his efforts to isolate Pakistan. Instead of isolation, the US actually tripled its aid to Pakistan. The entire Bharati establishment was in high gear trying to portray Pakistan as a fountain of terror. The world rallied around Pakistan with arms and money to overcome the TTP. Sonia and gang wanted an embargo on Islamabad, China, Iran, the US and now even Russia is sending arms and equipment to the Pakistan army. The abject failure of diplomacy got Pranab Mukherjee fired. Now, Mr. Singh will be going soon too. This cartoon caricature defines Mr. Singh very concisely.

    Still others are wary that it will make India look as though it is bending to American pressure…

    William Burns last week nudged New Delhi by resurrecting Kashmir in his public remarks, saying that the wishes of the Kashmiri people should be taken into account in any settlement. This has long been United States policy, but any hint of interference by outside parties in what India sees as an internal affair tends to raise hackles here.

    Shamshad Ahmad, a former top Pakistani diplomat said that the meeting “breaks some ice,” adding that “this is only happening because of Washington’s pressure.”

    Despite India’s growing ties with the United States, there is no agreement in India about the Obama Administration’s engagement with Pakistan. Some fear that while the United States is keen to defeat the Taliban on Pakistan’s western border, it may not be ready to do enough to staunch Lashkar-e-Taiba and similar Pakistan-based groups that specialize in anti-Indian attacks. Lydia Polgren, Somini Sengupta, Published: June 16, 2009. Hint of a Thaw for India and Pakistan

    If Bharat wants peace with Pakistan, it has to dismantle the infrastructure of the RSS and the BJP and gag the Islamphobes that it nurtures within its borders. If Bharat wants peace it has to stop sabotaging Pakistan at all international forums, and begin supporting common and Pakistani causes. Jointly fighting for the Basmati patent, and IRRI copyright would help the atmosphere of friendship.

    Pakistan wants all issues back on the table, including UN resolutions passed in 1948 giving Kashmiris the right to a plebiscite, which had been set aside by former President Pervez Musharraf in an effort to secure a peace deal with India. “Musharraf went beyond his mandate. How can he set aside the UN?” said Hasan. “He went rather overboard in offering that to India. The Indians should have grabbed it, but they didn’t.” Daily Times

    The Bharti and Pakistan leaders were meeting in the Russian city of Yekaterinburg at the summit of the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation), a regional security body of Central Asia States led by China and Russia where both Bharat and Pakistan are observers. New Delhi which had tried to put on hold the so called five-year-old peace process. The so called peace process has ben long on talk and short on resutls, with Bharat using one excuse or the other not to resolve Kashmir, or withdraw its forces from Kargil, Sicahin, and Sir Creek. One of the excuses used was that  Pakistan must act against against the Lashkar-i-Taiba militants which Bharat holds responsible for the Mumbai attacks. Pakistan has been asking for proff of these allegations which has not been provided.

    The US has been instrumental in nudging Mr. Singh and his puppeteers in Delhi. Hillary Clinton will be visiting the area soon to consecrate the “composite dialogue” and a settlement of Sir Creek, Siahin, Water and Kashmir.

    US pressure has already begun paying dividends and a significant change in the Indian mood vis-à-vis ties with Pakistan is noticeable. Recent statements by Indian leadership including those by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, President Pratibha Patil and Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna are indicative of a shift in the Indian position.

    Diplomats say there is a growing realization in Delhi as to how long it could sustain the policy of not talking to Islamabad particularly in the backdrop of the fact that the desired objectives of the talks’ suspension have not achieved their objectives and were rather hurting India’s own regional interests.

    Besides, diplomats believe that India is cognizant of growing US pressure for the resumption of the peace process, and wants strained relations to start returning to normalcy soon, because it would not like the normalization to be perceived as a Washington driven initiative. Dawn

    There is much in common between India and Pakistan, but there is much that separates the countries. Mere cultural affinity and anathema to religion cannot wish the differences away. Bharat must recognize that Pakistanis do not see Delhi as the perfect model to emulate on anything. Therefore Delhi must stop wishing for a Pakistan in its own image. There are many routes to success, and Pakistanis admire the Chinese a lot more than they admire Indians. The Pakistani world is asking. Why meet in Egypt if the Bharatis have forgotten their manners.

    The statements emanating out of Delhi seem to suggest that Bharat (aka India) will begin talks about peace with Pakistan if this, that, or the other happens. This is the typical Bharati arrogance that keeps both countries embroiled in perpetual enmity. India, come what may, cannot dictate its terms to Islamabad. If Bharat wants peace in the Subcontinent, it has to change its attitude towards all her neighbors–Nepal, Lanka, Bhutan, Sikkim, China, Bangladesh and Pakistan. While the other states may accept some bullying from Delhi, China and Pakistan will not. In the light of the Nuclear factor, Delhi cannot out stare Islamabad.

    Speaking yesterday, Zardari reiterated the need for better communication and cooperation within the region, saying ‘I think what is missing in this war … is that the neighbours haven’t been involved, the region has not been involved’.Agencies/AFP/Dawn

    Delhi has to tone down its rhetoric on terror. Islamabad and the world knows who is behind the TTP in Swat. If Delhi wants peace with Pakistan, it has to pull back in Afghanistan and Swat. It has to make major territorial concessions in Kashmir and the border areas. Once the border disputes have been resolved, the sky is the limit in cooperation with Pakistan. Sir Creek and Siachin have to solved and resolved quickly. Once Kashmir is resolved in accordance with the UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people, the Pakistan government will find to problem in helping Bharat gain trans-national travel through Pakistan. However this  has to be on a mutual basis which would allow Pakistani truck to reach Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh. Bharat must live up to the letter and the spirit of the Indus Water treaty and begin treating Pakistanis are friends rather than enemies. A positive development was the supportive statments by the Russian president.

    Russian President Dmitri Medvedev reiterated this at a meeting with Zardari, saying that ‘we are ready for cooperation with Pakistan in all aspects of the fight against terrorism,’ urging better economic ties with the country viewed in Moscow as a US ally. ‘We think it is important that the situation in the region becomes calmer and healthier,’ he added. ‘I this will help … to preserve Pakistan as a single and strong state.’

    It is not Delhi’s god given right to rule Kabul. Nor does Bharat extend from Kabul to the Raj Kalhani in the East. Bharati religions preach the eternal history of Bharat beyond its borders. If Bharat is a secular country then this transnational dreams of a greater Bharat must be brought back to reality. Every time Adhvani and Modi open their mouths, peace is sent back a decade.. Mr. Singh had earlier kept up his mantra on terror.

    ‘The spectre of terrorism, extremist ideologies and illicit drug trafficking haunts our region. Terrorist crimes committed today are transnational in nature,’ Singh said in the text of the speech, which was given to reporters. He added that ‘it is imperative that we genuinely cooperate with one another and on a global scale to resolutely defeat international terrorism.’

    There are many types of peace. It is obvious that India has neither the capacity nor the wherewithal to impose peace of the sort that exists between the Native Americans and the US government. India is not Israel and Pakistan is not the Gaza strip. If Israel with all its might could not force an unequal peace on unequal partners (Syria, Palestinians and Lebanon) it is also very obvious that Delhi cannot impose peace on Pakistan the same way. Bharat could not break up Lanka and make it Kowtow to Bharat. It cannot force Pakistan. It has to woo Pakistanis if she wants peace on her Western borders.